Teams

BHSC Causing a Racquet-Neubecker

2024 Charlottesville Adult Other 55 Doubles · Charlottesville Adult Other 55 Doubles 6.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-05vs Keswick-MerrickLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Park / Jannemieke Keener vs Merrily Main D'Arpino / Amelia Black3-6, 2-6
2024-10-23vs Keswick-MerrickWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Park / Jannemieke Keener vs Susan Cabell Mains / Amelia Black6-4, 6-3
2024-10-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesWendi Ruschmann / Patricia Irby vs Chris Bailey / Mary Gerloff4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-15vs ACAC-BaileyWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Pietro / Wendi Ruschmann vs Diane Simon / Deborah Smith6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-10-10vs ACAC-BaileyLost 01
L#1 DoublesWendi Ruschmann / Patricia Irby vs Judith Ely / Chris Bailey6-7, 4-6
2024-10-08vs Keswick-MerrickLost 01
L#2 DoublesWendi Ruschmann / Deaun Sanders vs Tia Schurecht / Janet Silvester2-6, 5-7
2024-09-27vs Keswick-MerrickLost 01
L#1 DoublesWendi Ruschmann / Susan Park vs Janet Silvester / Cailin Collier4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-09-23vs ACAC-BaileyWon 10
W#2 DoublesWendi Ruschmann / Kathleen Kelly vs Marguerite Haensel / Martha Donnelly5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult Other 55 Doubles 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Patricia Irby
published
2.85
Susan Park
published
2.83
Jannemieke Keener
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Bunny French
published 3
2.74
Gretchen Masselli
published
2.74
Wendi Ruschmann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Arlene Okun
published 3
Laura Pietro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jannemieke Keener + Wendi Ruschmann9954% games+7.8% vs expected
Susan Park + Wendi Ruschmann3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Irby
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
Susan Park
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Jannemieke Keener
56W–61L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Bunny French
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.75
Gretchen Masselli
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Wendi Ruschmann
68W–67L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Arlene Okun
0W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
Laura Pietro
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.