Teams

Thomas/Memphis

2025 Mixed 18 & Over - Memphis · 4.0 Mixed 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-22vs Alexander/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesDena Mullen / John Mullen vs Oscar Carr / Stephanie Dent6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHunter Ivy / Lynn Davis vs John Gleysteen / Shanna Eason6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesReagan Guess / Dana Deviney vs Sheila Carro / Clayton Eber6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-01vs Brown/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesMargo Gruen / Robert Rubin vs Cameron Seay / Joseph Shidler6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLynn Davis / Saarth Bhanot vs Nicole Amaro / Caden LeBlanc0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDana Deviney / Vidyasagar Velamala vs Lesley Grubbs / Daniel Murdoch1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Robert Rubin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Brooks Klepper
published 4
3.67
Margo Gruen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Vidyasagar Velamala
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Dena Mullen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Dana Deviney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.28
Hunter Ivy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
John Mullen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Hines
published
Reagan Guess
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Saarth Bhanot
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margo Gruen + Robert Rubin4260% games+21.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Rubin
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Brooks Klepper
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
Margo Gruen
34W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
Vidyasagar Velamala
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Dena Mullen
24W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
4
Dana Deviney
9W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.29
3.5
Hunter Ivy
31W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
John Mullen
16W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Hines
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Reagan Guess
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Saarth Bhanot
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.