Teams

BM SILVER

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-07vs GR YELLOWWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristin Feldkamp / Kristiane Lucas vs Jodi Koelmel / Courtney Oltman6-4, 7-6
2023-08-31Won 10
W#1 SinglesKristiane Lucas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-24vs LEBTC TEALLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristiane Lucas / Kristin Feldkamp vs Keri Hanson / Megan Fry0-6, 3-6
2023-08-17Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLeah Putnam vs Riley Koldyke2-6, 1-6
2023-08-10vs LEBTC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristiane Lucas / Leah Putnam vs Kim Kronenberger Hogan / Christianne Blevins1-6, 1-6
2023-08-03vs CCC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeah Putnam / Kristiane Lucas vs Terri Slekes / Tonya Rasmussen4-6, 2-6
2023-07-27vs PH PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesLeah Putnam / Kristiane Lucas vs Stacie Cowell / Stacey Hawes3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.36
Leah Putnam
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.35
Kristin Feldkamp
published
2.33
Dina Burgess
published
2.32
Sarah Chapman
published
2.28
Kristiane Lucas
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
2.27
Lisa Matter
published
2.15
Jeni Halingstad
published
2.04
Melinda Lockhart
published
1.99
Susan Berndt
published
Elizabeth Riggs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Feldkamp + Jeni Halingstad134 matchesnot enough data
Melinda Lockhart + Jeni Halingstad224 matchesnot enough data
Dina Burgess + Jeni Halingstad224 matchesnot enough data
Kristiane Lucas + Jeni Halingstad213 matchesnot enough data
Kristiane Lucas + Leah Putnam033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Leah Putnam
48W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%84%16%
2.36
Kristin Feldkamp
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%86%14%
2.35
Dina Burgess
13W–20L career · no lines in 2023
0%89%11%
2.33
Sarah Chapman
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Kristiane Lucas
22W–64L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%94%6%
2.28
Lisa Matter
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%95%5%
2.27
Jeni Halingstad
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.15
Melinda Lockhart
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Susan Berndt
4W–18L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Elizabeth Riggs
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.