Teams

Ligh/18/3.5/M/BREC

2023 City Championship 18 & Over - Men · 3.5 BR (18&O) Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings9 teams · 3.5 BR (18&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ligh/18/3.5/M/BREC8032820239
2Haag/18/3.5/M/UClub7131924240
3Gomez/18/3.5/M/BREC52221331268
4Leonard/18/3.5/M/CCLA53221840349
5Crowell/18/3.5/M/BREC44241638349
6Minton/18/3.5/M/Legacy34161940302
7Whitfield/18/3.5/M/BREC26172347354
8Mitchell/18/3.5/M/BREC1773369446
9Loupe/18/3.5/M/BREC0843672441

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emre Bolukbasi
published 4
Evan Delhom
published 4
3.60
Alexander Do
published 3.5
3.55
Markus Wilson
published
3.43
Blake Carville
published 3.5
3.43
Toby Waguespack
published
3.40
Stephen Manuel
published
3.38
Rodney Terral
published
3.37
Blake Cowart
published 3.5
3.37
Troy Goings
published
3.30
Ryan Wadenpfuhl
published
Daniel Marshall
published 3.5
3.17
Ryan Eschete
published
3.15
ROBERT WHITNEY
published
3.08
Randy Ligh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

ROBERT WHITNEY + Evan Delhom4163% games+13.1% vs expected
Ryan Eschete + Markus Wilson5165% games+12.2% vs expected
Evan Delhom + Markus Wilson5066% games+9.0% vs expected
ROBERT WHITNEY + Stephen Manuel4155% games+8.8% vs expected
Toby Waguespack + Rodney Terral10463% games+8.2% vs expected
Troy Goings + Markus Wilson5158% games−0.5% vs expected
ROBERT WHITNEY + Ryan Wadenpfuhl5352% games−0.7% vs expected
Toby Waguespack + Blake Cowart224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emre Bolukbasi
10W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Evan Delhom
17W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Alexander Do
46W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.60
Markus Wilson
68W–49L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Blake Carville
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.43
Toby Waguespack
57W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.43
Stephen Manuel
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
Rodney Terral
53W–40L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Blake Cowart
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
Troy Goings
50W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
Ryan Wadenpfuhl
31W–47L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Daniel Marshall
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ryan Eschete
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
ROBERT WHITNEY
41W–44L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
Randy Ligh
3W–17L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.