Teams

CCOC COLEMAN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-23vs CSCC TAFOLLAWon 41
W#1 DoublesKolsie Coleman / Marishah Erickson vs Gloria Carpenter / Sutton Spanton6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMichelle Erlander vs Diane Wilborn6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBronwyn Holman / Shannon Leifer vs Julie Davis / Colleen Miller6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesLaura Hemsworth vs Erin Rhodes6-2, 3-3
W#3 DoublesMelissa Jamison / Joy Farmer vs Peggy McNulty / Kathryn Seibert6-0, 6-0
2022-05-16vs PBTC RAYWon 41
W#1 DoublesKolsie Coleman / Shannon Leifer vs Michelle Cauthon / Rochelle Wristen6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Hocate vs Geepress Corpuz6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoy Farmer / Melissa Jamison vs Nora Day / Jean Ray6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBronwyn Holman vs Nova Kelly6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMallory Sharp / Marishah Erickson vs Jeanette Boughton / Holly Waller6-0, 6-2
2022-05-09vs MEMPK VIEIRAWon 50
W#1 DoublesKolsie Coleman / Shannon Leifer vs Tracy Grant / Kris Quinones6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMelissa Hocate vs Carmen Kolson6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoy Farmer / Jenisha Bonicelli vs Stacey Self / Heidi Williams6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBronwyn Holman vs Krista Phillips6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMallory Sharp / Anne Janda vs Judy Walker / Teresa Vieira6-0, 6-2
2022-05-02vs LTFCS OSTLYWon 32
W#1 DoublesKolsie Coleman / Marishah Erickson vs Judi Ashmen / Nancy Thompson6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMelissa Hocate vs Lisa Ostly6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJoy Farmer / Shannon Leifer vs Sarah Lueckeman / Jane Glimco6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLaura Hemsworth vs Deena Hiltbrand6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJenisha Bonicelli / Melissa Jamison vs Linda Olson / Karma Keirns6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-04-25vs CSRC RAMSEYLost 23
W#1 DoublesMarishah Erickson / Kolsie Coleman vs Cindy Hoit / Robbie Conway7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMelissa Hocate vs Cheri Ramsey3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesShannon Leifer / Anne Janda vs MARY SCOTT / Alice Ratcliffe5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMichelle Erlander vs Jennifer Charlier Cox4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJenisha Bonicelli / Melissa Jamison vs Jennifer Gonzales / Patty McDowell6-1, 6-3
2022-04-18vs CSCC TAFOLLAWon 32
L#1 DoublesKolsie Coleman / Marishah Erickson vs Carre Bistline / Colleen Miller2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMelissa Hocate vs Julie Davis6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShannon Leifer / Joy Farmer vs Gloria Carpenter / Peggy McNulty7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMichelle Erlander vs Erin Rhodes6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJenisha Bonicelli / Anne Janda vs Sutton Spanton / Diane Wilborn0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCOC CARTER6022817214
2CCOC COLEMAN5121920187
3PBTC RAY33151533261
4GOG CARLSON0682246308

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Marishah Erickson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.36
Shannon Leifer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Kolsie Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Joy Farmer
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.10
Michelle Erlander
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.10
Anne Janda
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Melissa Hocate
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.77
Jenisha Bonicelli
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Bronwyn Holman
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Laura Hemsworth
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Mallory Sharp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kolsie Coleman + Shannon Leifer11160% games+10.0% vs expected
Shannon Leifer + Marishah Erickson6169% games+8.3% vs expected
Jenisha Bonicelli + Anne Janda10655% games+3.4% vs expected
Bronwyn Holman + Melissa Hocate4162% gamesnot enough data
Kolsie Coleman + Marishah Erickson4157% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Hocate + Jenisha Bonicelli303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marishah Erickson
35W–13L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Shannon Leifer
39W–9L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Kolsie Coleman
49W–31L career · 6 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Joy Farmer
49W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Michelle Erlander
40W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%22%78%
3.10
3.5
Anne Janda
29W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Melissa Hocate
23W–10L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
Jenisha Bonicelli
26W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Bronwyn Holman
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Hemsworth
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mallory Sharp
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.