Teams

ACAC - Hit and Run

2023 Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-18vs 40 - LoveSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBeverly Sweeney / Pamela Jupin vs Susie Abramson / Elizabeth Young0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesEsther Bausserman vs Maggie Nguyen7-5, 6-3
2023-07-13vs Forest LakesLost 13
L#1 DoublesSusan Bayliss / Beverly Sweeney vs Kathy Huddleston / Mary Beth Cancienne3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPamela Jupin vs Courtney Heyward7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEsther Bausserman / Kelli Wood vs Maggie Leary / Stephanie Hall6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Klein / Melissa Zeller vs Judy Roy / Linda Corradino7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2023-07-07vs Forest LakesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBeverly Sweeney / Susan Bayliss vs Mary Beth Cancienne / Allison Ewing2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesEsther Bausserman / Kelli Wood vs Maggie Leary / Noel Jorgensen7-5, 6-3
2023-07-06vs BHSC - BinkoLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeverly Sweeney / Susan Bayliss vs Belinda Blankenship / Amanda Daniero1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMelissa Zeller / Esther Bausserman vs Marcy MacGovern / Alice Walker6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Klein / Pamela Jupin vs Elizabeth Piper / Merrily Main D'Arpino3-6, 2-6
2023-06-15vs BHSC - BinkoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBeverly Sweeney / Susan Bayliss vs Melissa Hoover / Amy Taggart6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEsther Bausserman vs Ellen Hayes1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Kelli Wood
published
3.10
Melissa Zeller
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Susan Bayliss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.90
Pamela Jupin
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
2.85
Esther Bausserman
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 36% · published 3
2.81
Tara Ford
published
2.81
Leslie Mcdonald
published
2.80
Dalton Dorne
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Esther Bausserman + Pamela Jupin4741% gamesnot enough data
Esther Bausserman + Susan Bayliss5649% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Jupin + Susan Bayliss3645% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelli Wood
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Melissa Zeller
121W–104L career · 6 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Susan Bayliss
161W–226L career · 6 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Pamela Jupin
119W–141L career · type A · 9 lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
Esther Bausserman
108W–161L career · 11 lines in 2023
1%86%14%
2.85
Tara Ford
20W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Leslie Mcdonald
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Dalton Dorne
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.