← Teams

LOTC-Hong

2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.65 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Jacob Velasco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
3.90
Kevin Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.78
Shane Wilson
published 4
3.74
Colleen Nolan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.46
Jonathan Hong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Carolyn Graeper
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Celene Robert
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.26
Anthony Hoang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.25
Jordan Keomanivanh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.21
Danira Bilanovic
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-12-02Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAnthony Hoang / Colleen Nolan vs Craig Mcreary / Kathryn Harlan7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJordan Keomanivanh / Ginny Nguyen vs Julie Arness / Robert Piercy6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCelene Robert / Adam Oken vs Patricia Morrison / Richard Clark6-3, 6-4
2023-11-19Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAnthony Hoang / Colleen Nolan vs Edmundo Arroyo / Michelle Vo6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesShane Wilson / Danira Bilanovic vs Julia Bride / Ben Howard6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJonathan Hong / Cindy del Rosario vs Larry Van / Milo Nguyen7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-11-12Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesKalynn Belden / Jonathan Hong vs Ariana White / Ezra James6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-10-20Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJordan Keomanivanh / Ginny Nguyen vs John van Leeuwen / Kiersten Lake6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKevin Hughes / Carolyn Graeper vs Scott Cartwright / Victoria Cartwright6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAnthony Hoang / Colleen Nolan vs Autumn Bunch / Dan Bingham6-3, 6-4
2023-10-15Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesShane Wilson / Danira Bilanovic vs Jeri Finn / Richard Sohn6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKalynn Belden / Jordan Keomanivanh vs Bethany Bounds / John Magaddino6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMorganne Hatfield / Jacob Velasco vs Charity Steele / Eric Steele6-4, 7-5
2023-10-06Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesShane Wilson / Danira Bilanovic vs Kim Tellin / Paul Harwood6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJordan Keomanivanh / Celene Robert vs Arjun Bilakanti / Cathy Gatzke6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2023-09-17Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesShane Wilson / Carolyn Graeper vs Tina Farrelly / Peter Farrelly7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMorganne Hatfield / Kevin Hughes vs Anna Koepke / Peter Hoang7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2023-09-16Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKevin Hughes / Danira Bilanovic vs David Smiley / Vicki Blunt6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Graeper / Jacob Velasco vs Heidi Palena / Robert Palena7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCelene Robert / Jonathan Hong vs Sarah Kaufman / Andrew Geisler6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Jacob Velasco
62W–14L career
not enough data
—
4
Kevin Hughes
102W–53L career
0%94%6%
3.90
4
Shane Wilson
15W–13L career
1%97%2%
3.78
4
Colleen Nolan
177W–79L career
1%99%0%
3.74
3.5
Jonathan Hong
92W–73L career
0%80%20%
3.46
3.5
Carolyn Graeper
54W–20L career
0%96%4%
3.37
3.5
Celene Robert
26W–55L career
1%99%0%
3.27
3
Anthony Hoang
30W–32L career
0%11%89%
3.26
3.5
Jordan Keomanivanh
51W–86L career
1%99%0%
3.25
3
Danira Bilanovic
42W–19L career
0%24%76%
3.21

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.