Teams

LLTOWNLEY/CSD

2022 Lake USTA 65 & Over League · Men 3.0 Tues PM

5 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-19Split 11
L#1 DoublesJim Staley / Michael Raynor vs Thomas Wood / Larry Roberts7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBaxter Price / Timothy Harasek vs Steven Ames / Gregory DeLuca6-4, 6-4
2022-04-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesLarry Townley / Baxter Price vs Mac McNicholas / Thomas Fay6-1, 6-1
2022-04-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesLarry Townley / Steve Riddle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-29Won 20
W#2 DoublesSteve Riddle / Larry Townley vs Steven Ames / Gregory DeLuca6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBaxter Price / Michael Raynor vs Thomas Fay / DW Boyd6-0, 6-4
2022-03-22Split 11
L#2 DoublesLarry Townley / Steve Riddle vs Bill Simpson / Mac McNicholas7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTimothy Harasek / Baxter Price vs Gregory DeLuca / DW Boyd6-2, 7-5
2022-03-15Won 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Raynor / Jim Staley vs Thomas Wood / VICTOR MATZ6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Riddle / Larry Townley vs Steven Ames / DW Boyd6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBaxter Price / Timothy Harasek vs Bill Simpson / Mac McNicholas1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-14Won 20
W#1 DoublesLarry Townley / Steve Riddle vs Steven Ames / Mac McNicholas6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJim Staley / Michael Raynor vs Larry Roberts / Thomas Fay6-2, 6-0
2022-03-01Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLarry Townley / Ken Tolson vs Larry Roberts / Thomas Wood0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Raynor / Jim Staley vs VICTOR MATZ / Gregory DeLuca6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBaxter Price / Timothy Harasek vs Steven Ames / Mac McNicholas5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Sandy Manly
published 3
2.60
Michael Raynor
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.57
Larry Townley
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.40
Baxter Price
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.33
Gary Powell
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Larry Townley + Baxter Price1731% gamesnot enough data
Michael Raynor + Baxter Price303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sandy Manly
17W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%11%89%
3.16
3
Michael Raynor
11W–35L career · type S · 5 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.60
3
Larry Townley
22W–70L career · 7 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
2.5
Baxter Price
44W–105L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%79%21%
2.40
3
Gary Powell
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.