Teams

Cathy & Willy

2021 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-11-22vs Team 7Won 30
W#1 DoublesCatherine Stone / Ramon Luna vs Leilah Hemmen / Joe Buckwalter7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Peter Lang vs Marlys Morton / Bryan Martin4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBonnie Hemry / Willy Stone vs Susan Brunner / Anthony Brooks7-5, 6-0
2020-11-15vs Team 7Won 21
W#1 DoublesBonnie Hemry / Willy Stone vs Susan Brunner / Jay Green6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCatherine Stone / Ramon Luna vs Triin Minton / Anthony Brooks6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Matthew Hemry vs Leilah Hemmen / Joe Buckwalter1-6, 5-7
2020-11-08vs No FaultsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatthew Hemry / Penny Rohacek vs Janet Bidwell / Mitchell Roth6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWilly Stone / Bonnie Hemry vs Fledz Lastimoso / NOEL LASTIMOSO7-5, 2-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Stone / Ramon Luna vs Dolores Alley / Konrad Kaltemborn6-0, 6-1
2020-11-01vs Brock LobstersLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Stone / Ramon Luna vs Dane Markell / Jennifer Duclos3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMatthew Hemry / Penny Rohacek vs Patrick Rumley / ELIZE Rumley3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesWilly Stone / Bonnie Hemry vs Dana Griffin / Brock Steller5-7, 3-6
2020-10-25vs Brock LobstersWon 21
L#1 DoublesBonnie Hemry / Willy Stone vs Jennifer Duclos / Dane Markell2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Matthew Hemry vs ELIZE Rumley / Patrick Rumley7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCatherine Stone / Ramon Luna vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2020-10-18vs Game, Set, MasksLost 12
W#1 DoublesBonnie Hemry / Willy Stone vs Zareena Clendaniel / Krisada Meephothong6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Peter Lang vs Allen Clendaniel / Rena Yancha2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCatherine Stone / Ramon Luna vs Vicki Moe / Fred Lief2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Brock Lobsters4212613138
2Cathy & Willy4211715149
3Team 74210819155
4Game, Set, Masks3310819152

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Catherine Stone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Matthew Hemry
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
2.87
Willy Stone
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published 3
2.67
Penny Rohacek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Bonnie Hemry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Stone + Willy Stone21858% games+13.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Stone
189W–51L career · 12 lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Matthew Hemry
44W–34L career · type S · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Willy Stone
110W–70L career · 12 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Penny Rohacek
49W–47L career · 10 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67
Bonnie Hemry
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.