Teams

S OR-ATFC-Patton

2023 ADULT 65 & Over · 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-07vs ACB-FarberLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Atzman / Carol Yirak vs Janey Evans / Carolyn Peters4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKate McInerny / Nancy Walz vs Ginger Alden / Karla Farber3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAlexis Packer / Ellen Miller vs Maureen Everett / Darla Farstvedt6-2, 6-1
2023-05-06vs ACB-FarberWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Atzman / Gail Patton vs Maureen Everett / Karla Farber6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDana Yearsley / Carol Yirak vs Ginger Alden / Janey Evans6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKate McInerny / Nancy Walz vs Darla Farstvedt / Carolyn Peters6-4, 6-4
2023-04-30vs ACB-FarberWon 21
W#1 DoublesGail Patton / Leslie Zauher vs Karla Farber / Darla Farstvedt6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEllen Miller / Carol Yirak vs Maureen Everett / Julianne Wimberly6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Atzman / Nancy Walz vs Ginger Alden / Janey Evans0-6, 0-6
2023-04-29vs ACB-FarberWon 21
W#1 DoublesGail Patton / Leslie Zauher vs Ginger Alden / Janey Evans6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Atzman / Nancy Walz vs Maureen Everett / Julianne Wimberly6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEllen Miller / Carol Yirak vs Karla Farber / Darla Farstvedt6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1S OR-ATFC-Patton318411107
2ACB-Farber134817117

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Dana Yearsley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Carol Yirak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Alexis Packer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Kate McInerny
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Gail Patton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Zauher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Walz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Atzman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Yirak + Kate McInerny41044% games−6.7% vs expected
Gail Patton + Leslie Zauher3549% gamesnot enough data
Kate McInerny + Nancy Walz1436% gamesnot enough data
Susan Atzman + Nancy Walz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dana Yearsley
40W–19L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Carol Yirak
42W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Alexis Packer
24W–13L career · 1 line in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
Kate McInerny
19W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
Gail Patton
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Leslie Zauher
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Walz
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Atzman
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.