Teams

TYCC - M. James

2026 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesHaley Lorenzen / Sarah Lindbeck vs Carolina Costa Borges / Silvia Perucica5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesXanna Gerber / Kirsten Perez vs Dimariliz Otero / Aubrey Jeffers6-1, 6-3
2026-03-23vs Avila Aces - I. PetersonLost 02
L#1 DoublesBelem Schmidt / Kirsten Perez vs Mariana Rodriguez / Tara O'Grady6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMolly James vs ALEXANDRA JENKINS6-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesAmanda Winn / Kirsten Perez vs Ruby Sanders / Amy Brumby2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Boe vs Michelle Binder6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBelem Schmidt / Elise Szafranski vs Melissa Speidel / Michelle Graba6-3, 7-5
2026-02-27vs Arbor Greene - D. ConnellWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Boe / Molly James vs Cheri Snyder / Susan Frisina6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesXanna Gerber vs VEENA RAMESH1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBelem Schmidt / Sarah Lindbeck vs Francesca LoMonaco / Devon Connell6-1, 6-1
2026-02-20vs LifeTime Team 2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Boe / Amanda Winn vs Gia Marinelli / Jacqueline Luhrs1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHaley Lorenzen / Sarah Lindbeck vs Lisa Reins / Alexis Schulman2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMolly James / Xanna Gerber vs Carol Schweitzer / Jody Jotham3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesHaley Lorenzen vs Melanie Walter7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBelem Schmidt / Elise Szafranski vs Jessica Greiwe / Kristen Wenk6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesSarah Lindbeck / Xanna Gerber vs Laurie Daigle / Caro Massari6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMolly James vs Ashley Terry2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKirsten Perez / Belem Schmidt vs Jessica Shea / Nancy Cavanaugh6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.33
Sarah Boe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.30
Xanna Gerber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.29
Belem Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.15
Kristen Richards
published
2.12
Haley Lorenzen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.10
Sarah Lindbeck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.09
Molly James
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.08
Amanda Winn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Elise Szafranski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Belem Schmidt + Kristen Richards033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Boe
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
Xanna Gerber
3W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
2.5
Belem Schmidt
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
Kristen Richards
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
Haley Lorenzen
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Sarah Lindbeck
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Molly James
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Amanda Winn
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Elise Szafranski
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.