Teams

BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA 18AM4.0C

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
W#1 DoublesJoe Liebeschuetz / Peter Kuo vs Shrinivas Venkatraman / Louis Hsiao6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesPhilip Thomas / Joe Liebeschuetz vs Andrei Karakoulka / Shridharan Muthu6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-07vs PENINSULA GCC 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoe Liebeschuetz / Philip Thomas vs Andrew Cattano / James Funk6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMarc Manuel / Joe Liebeschuetz vs Motilal Agrawal / Mark Niu6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-05-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJoe Liebeschuetz / Ben Hickey vs Ping Yu / Danny Reyes7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-05-21vs BROOKSIDE 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoe Liebeschuetz / Rajeev Prasad vs Benny Barbero / Prajval Parthasarathy7-6, 6-3
L#1 DoublesWilliam Daniher / Joe Liebeschuetz vs Edward Moreno / Taro Itayama6-7, 4-6
2023-04-28vs CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC 18AM4.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesJoe Liebeschuetz / Igor Zavarsky vs Albert Law / Hank Wang3-6, 0-6
2023-04-23vs PENINSULA GCC 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoe Liebeschuetz / Gunther Lenz vs Andy Ballard / Andrew Cattano6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFeng Kan / Joe Liebeschuetz vs Kang Chen / Yash Kshirsagar1-6, 4-6
2023-04-16vs WALLENBERG PK 18AM4.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesRaj Talluri / Joe Liebeschuetz vs Alexander Liu / An-Vincent Nguyen5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoe Liebeschuetz / Ben Hickey vs Bill Jautz / Rodrick Som6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Joe Liebeschuetz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 4
3.85
Raj Talluri
published
3.83
Bobby Carter
published 4
3.79
Rajeev Prasad
published
3.63
Emad Gad
published 4
3.58
Jean-Marc Cabrol
published
3.43
Peter Kuo
published
3.43
Steve Degner
published
3.13
Orhan Baser
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joe Liebeschuetz + Raj Talluri5070% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joe Liebeschuetz
96W–64L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
Raj Talluri
19W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Bobby Carter
37W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
Rajeev Prasad
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Emad Gad
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
Jean-Marc Cabrol
33W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.58
Peter Kuo
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.43
Steve Degner
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
Orhan Baser
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.