Teams

Curtis/Bella Vista/MRC

2026 Combo 40 & Over 6.5, 8.5 · 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-09vs Neal/Rogers/SVCCLost 02
L#2 DoublesTammy Waddell / Jennifer Burleson vs Aimee Zana / Kelley Cullen0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Curtis / Karen Kavanaugh vs Melanie Neal / Sherry Fitzgerald4-6, 1-6
2025-10-02vs Neal/Rogers/SVCCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Franklin / Kara Welton vs Kelley Cullen / Aimee Zana1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTammy Waddell / Jennifer Burleson vs Katy Lollar / Serena Hampton7-5, 6-3
2025-08-31vs Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRCLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Kavanaugh / Kara Welton vs Angela Larimer / Shannon Hendrix6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Brenda Parker
published 3.5
3.11
Heather Snell
published 3
3.07
Tammy Waddell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Kat Bova
published
2.77
Deborah Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Kara Welton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Jennifer Burleson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Samantha Neel
published
Shari Collins
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brenda Parker
8W–12L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Heather Snell
47W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.11
Tammy Waddell
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Kat Bova
9W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Deborah Curtis
19W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Kara Welton
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Jennifer Burleson
15W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.69
Samantha Neel
13W–15L career · no lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Shari Collins
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.