Teams

CLetorney (Piper Glen)

2026 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.22 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-24vs TWalker (Carmel)Won 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca Cooper / Kim Sheehey vs Molly Morris / Anna Smith6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesColleen Everett / Tammy Golder vs Tara Walker / PATRICIA DRIES6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatty Swan / Carrie Letorney vs Deborah Biggers / Tamara Wise6-1, 5-5
2026-04-17vs LSobodash/White (Pine Lake)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Hunley / Kim Sheehey vs Connie Daniel / Robin Boyles2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRebecca Cooper / Denise Boeh vs Susan Brightwell / Cyndi Thilo4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTAMMIE BRANDT / Tama van Wie vs Rene Griffin / Lori Jones2-6, 3-6
2026-04-10vs MGlover (Russell)Won 21
L#1 DoublesRobin Smith / Tammy Golder vs Elaine Scott / Ellen Archer3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKim Sheehey / Stacey Whitney vs Margaret MacKie / Teresa Rhyne6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Hunley / Kathy Harborne vs Anne Sykes / Lynn Pronier6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-03vs TSetzer (WSRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesRebecca Cooper / TAMMIE BRANDT vs Celia Stallings / Joanne Miller6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Hunley / Patty Swan vs Karen Sterrett / Jane Neese6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-27vs LO'Shea (Southampton)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRebecca Cooper / Kathy Harborne vs Sarah Terrio / Denise Bost7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTAMMIE BRANDT / Robin Smith vs Teri Iezzi / Cheri Johnson1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTama van Wie / Carrie Letorney vs Pauline Styers / Paige Golding1-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesRebecca Cooper / Stacey Whitney vs Susan Additon / Vanessa Pomfrey6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDenise Boeh / Patty Swan vs Claudia Ridley / Suzanne Jones6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatti Tobin / Colleen Everett vs Brenda Tobia / Kate Merrill4-6, 0-6
2026-03-13vs KHargett (Palisades)Won 30
W#1 DoublesRebecca Cooper / Kathy Harborne vs Joy Landesman / Sandra Stowe3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Hunley / Kim Sheehey vs Jill Carnahan / Sherry McCoy6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobin Smith / Patty Swan vs Katherine Hargett / Julie Benton6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kim Sheehey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Stacey Whitney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Tammy Golder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Rebecca Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.10
TAMMIE BRANDT
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Kathy Harborne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.06
Linda Hunley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.93
Colleen Everett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.81
Patty Swan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Denise Boeh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Carrie Letorney
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Patti Tobin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tama van Wie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Cooper + Kathy Harborne3355% games+10.9% vs expected
Linda Hunley + Kim Sheehey5358% games−0.3% vs expected
Stacey Whitney + Kim Sheehey4258% gamesnot enough data
TAMMIE BRANDT + Kim Sheehey3255% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Cooper + Kim Sheehey3254% gamesnot enough data
Stacey Whitney + Kathy Harborne134 matchesnot enough data
Linda Hunley + Denise Boeh044 matchesnot enough data
TAMMIE BRANDT + Rebecca Cooper123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kim Sheehey
56W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Stacey Whitney
180W–137L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.39
Tammy Golder
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Rebecca Cooper
17W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
TAMMIE BRANDT
50W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Kathy Harborne
115W–77L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Linda Hunley
31W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.06
3.5
Colleen Everett
1W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Patty Swan
64W–80L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Denise Boeh
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Carrie Letorney
23W–45L career · 6 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Patti Tobin
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tama van Wie
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.