Teams

Summitt - Hicks/Yearta

2025 SCTA Winter '24 · '25 - USTA Adult 40 & Over Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.40 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for '25 - USTA Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Lauren Terranova
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
3.54
Ashley Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.54
Kathleene Lollis
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Carrie Ann Johanson
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.49
Tori Yearta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.48
Katherine Patman
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #4 Doubles 14% · published
3.45
Briana Rider
published 3.5
3.36
Tamara LeClair
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.33
Suzanna Obsitnik
usually #4 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.29
Janelle Shively
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Huguette Foster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Kerri Edwards
usually #4 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
3.17
Cindy Hicks
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.03
Juliet Skonberg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 22% · published
2.94
Annette Burns
usually #4 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamara LeClair + Carrie Ann Johanson7165% games+11.6% vs expected
Tamara LeClair + Lauren Terranova4165% games+11.2% vs expected
Briana Rider + Ashley Jackson22374% games+4.9% vs expected
Juliet Skonberg + Suzanna Obsitnik2448% games+4.5% vs expected
Katherine Patman + Kerri Edwards2354% games+0.1% vs expected
Kerri Edwards + Tamara LeClair1639% gamesnot enough data
Tori Yearta + Lauren Terranova4262% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Patman + Kathleene Lollis5071% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Terranova
24W–13L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.72
3.5
Ashley Jackson
33W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Kathleene Lollis
28W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Carrie Ann Johanson
21W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Tori Yearta
34W–12L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
Katherine Patman
36W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Briana Rider
32W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Tamara LeClair
44W–34L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Suzanna Obsitnik
13W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Janelle Shively
10W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Huguette Foster
19W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Kerri Edwards
42W–26L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
3.5
Cindy Hicks
15W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Juliet Skonberg
16W–16L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Annette Burns
7W–9L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.