Teams

Pair Jordans

2024 Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over · Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-09vs BreakersLost 13
L#1 DoublesChristopher Fu / Trey Perez vs Alex Bartczak / Raghu Menon2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMichael Polmanteer vs Andrew Scott7-5, 3-3
L#2 DoublesIshmael Alejo / Josh Perry vs Jerome Lebleu / Michael Murchison2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKenneth Shin vs Lwazi Rennert1-6, 3-6
2024-06-08vs GrandslammersWon 21
W#1 DoublesTrey Perez / Saad Zarhloul vs Gary Hulsey / Ricardo Scarlatella7-6, 2-2
L#1 SinglesChristopher Fu vs Brayden Cohen0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Polmanteer / Ben Vonachen vs Tom St Hilaire / Jayesh Jayashankar6-4, 5-3
2024-06-02vs HitmenLost 05
L#1 DoublesDanny Nguyen / Christopher Fu vs David Neuman / Angel Fernandez1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMichael Polmanteer vs Peter Gromkowski2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJosh Perry / Ishmael Alejo vs Ian Burke / Curtis Derek Owens2-6, 5-4
L#2 SinglesSaad Zarhloul vs Sam Friedman1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKenneth Shin / Ben Vonachen vs Sid M / Xavier Scipio4-6, 4-4
2024-05-19vs Cedar SpiritLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristopher Fu / Saad Zarhloul vs Ben Winik / Kevin Taylor0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKenneth Shin / Ben Vonachen vs Matthew Holubecki / Ali Hamdani1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMichael Polmanteer vs Jeremy Siegfried7-5, 2-2
2024-05-04vs Net AssetsLost 05
L#1 DoublesChristopher Fu / Michael Polmanteer vs Joshua Lobert / Johan Holmberg2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDarvin Johnson vs Conner Healy1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSaad Zarhloul / Robert Walters vs Brian Mead / Nathan Quan0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLuis de Pool vs Peter Stebbins0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesIshmael Alejo / Josh Perry vs Frederic Colas / JANAK MEHTA5-7, 2-5
2024-04-14vs RogersLost 05
L#1 DoublesSaad Zarhloul / Kevin Sakaguchi vs Bryan Kay / Johnny Hsiung0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTrey Perez vs Brian Cheng1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDarvin Johnson / Joshua Spann vs Elliot Rogers / Ryan Rosenkranz6-7, 0-3
L#2 SinglesLuis de Pool vs Jeff Rosenblum0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBen Vonachen / David Brown vs ALBERT TENG / CHRISTOPHER AMOSS2-6, 1-6
2024-04-13vs Stand and DeliverLost 13
W#1 DoublesTrey Perez / Michael Polmanteer vs Mike Hill Jr / Brendan Edgecombe6-3, 6-6
L#1 SinglesKevin Sakaguchi vs Bryan Fisher2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKenneth Shin / David Brown vs Kenzell Crawford / Dennis Martinez1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDarvin Johnson / Joshua Spann vs Jude Tanga / Dremon Miller4-6, 4-5
2024-04-07vs Highly StrungLost 03
L#1 DoublesTrey Perez / Michael Polmanteer vs William Bates / Jeffrey Santos2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKevin Sakaguchi vs Devin Stone2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBen Vonachen / Danny Nguyen vs Robert Luftglass / Ted Breinig1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Michael Polmanteer
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Ben Vonachen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
Ishmael Alejo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Christopher Fu
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Darvin Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Adriene Jordan
published 3.5
3.14
Kenneth Shin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Joshua Spann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kevin Sakaguchi
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Luis de Pool
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Saad Zarhloul
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Trey Perez
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Polmanteer + Ben Vonachen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Polmanteer
10W–14L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Ben Vonachen
1W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Ishmael Alejo
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Christopher Fu
7W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Darvin Johnson
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Adriene Jordan
19W–72L career · type S · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
Kenneth Shin
39W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.14
Joshua Spann
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Sakaguchi
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Luis de Pool
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Saad Zarhloul
5W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Trey Perez
5W–3L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.