GEPTA/18&over/3.5M/Rodriguez/EPTC#5

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEPTA

Schedule1 played

2025-09-23Lost 0–1

L#2 DoublesEduardo Dehesa / Jose Clarke vs Cesar Navar / Raul Puentes-Lowry1-6, 1-6

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71

Alberto Delarosa

usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 4

3.36

Bernardo Escudero

usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5

3.33

David Lozano Luque

usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5

3.01

Bill Ruddock

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3

—

Eduardo Dehesa

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published —

—

Gabriel Soto

usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published —

—

Gerardo Martinez

usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published —

—

Hector Montalvo

usually #2 Doubles 28%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published —

—

Jose Canales

usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Jose Clarke

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Julio Terrazas

usually #1 Singles 39%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published —

—

Miguel Aguilera

usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Omar Alcala Larrea

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published —

—

Ricardo Banuelos

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jose Clarke + Gabriel Soto	6–4	52% games	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Alberto Delarosa

17W–6L career · 17 lines in 2026

7%91%2%

3.71

3.5

Bernardo Escudero

38W–29L career · 27 lines in 2026

1%84%15%

3.36

3.5

David Lozano Luque

20W–4L career · 13 lines in 2026

1%88%11%

3.33

Bill Ruddock

73W–81L career · 35 lines in 2026

<1%46%54%

3.01

—

Eduardo Dehesa

0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026

not enough data

—

Gabriel Soto

39W–42L career · 29 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Gerardo Martinez

21W–12L career · 14 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Hector Montalvo

29W–10L career · 35 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jose Canales

5W–12L career · 12 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jose Clarke

12W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Julio Terrazas

47W–22L career · 25 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Miguel Aguilera

15W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Omar Alcala Larrea

3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Ricardo Banuelos

6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.