Teams

MSIL A40&O 3.0M Thongsithavong-Springfield

2026 MSIL Adult 40 & Over -MSIL West League · West MSIL A40 & Over 3.0M

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-23vs MSIL A40&O 3.0M Arns-QuincyLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlex Andreatta / Landon Page vs Jeremy Arns / Mike Wood6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoe Hankins / Gary McCandless vs Jim Shumake / William Hyde6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKeith Clayton / Terry Montgomery vs James Peterson / Randy DAVIS7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-23vs MSIL A40&O 3.0M Arns-QuincyWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlex Andreatta / Landon Page vs Jim Shumake / Mike Wood2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGary McCandless / Joe Hankins vs William Hyde / Jeremy Arns4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKeith Clayton / Terry Montgomery vs James Peterson / Randy DAVIS6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-08vs MSIL A40&O 3.0M Arns-QuincySplit 11
L#1 SinglesJoe Hankins vs Mike Wood4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAlex Andreatta / Landon Page vs Jeremy Arns / James Peterson6-4, 6-4
2026-07-08vs MSIL A40&O 3.0M Arns-QuincySplit 11
L#1 SinglesJoe Hankins vs James Peterson2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlex Andreatta / Landon Page vs Jeremy Arns / Jim Shumake4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-02vs MSIL A40&O 3.0M Arns-QuincyLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlex Andreatta / Joe Hankins vs Randy DAVIS / Jason Klinner1-6, 6-7
2026-05-02vs MSIL A40&O 3.0M Arns-QuincyLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlex Andreatta / Joe Hankins vs James Peterson / Steven Hayden1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for West MSIL A40 & Over 3.0M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Gary McCandless
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Joe Hankins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.48
Alex Andreatta
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Steve Scott
published
Terry Montgomery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Montgomery + Gary McCandless044 matchesnot enough data
Gary McCandless + Joe Hankins134 matchesnot enough data
Joe Hankins + Alex Andreatta033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sonthana Thongsithavong
25W–14L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.13
3
Gary McCandless
1W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Joe Hankins
9W–53L career · 6 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.60
3
Alex Andreatta
4W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Steve Scott
0W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Terry Montgomery
3W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.