Teams

Sportime Hi - Armada

2026 Tri Level Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-29vs 5.0 W Tri-level TIA White PlainsWon 20
W#1 DoublesANNIE KATZENBERG / Kristin Treadway vs Laura Cramer / Kathryn Mae Alandy5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristen Zallo / Irina ARGESEANU vs Amy Moore / Heidi Hollyhead6-4, 5-6
2026-03-22vs WTC: TriFecta-4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Albright / Patricia Jones vs Laura Buckley / Carrie Foley5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-20vs WTC: Tri-L 4.0 The Forever InsLost 03
L#1 DoublesMeredith Safer / Kristen Zallo vs Nina Brandt / Nicole Burgess1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesIrina ARGESEANU / Kate Hofmann vs Yuka Endo / Catherine Chatham4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Schecter / Bridget Bennett vs Heather Hemsley / Erendira Matzumura1-6, 2-6
2026-03-15vs Life Time Tri - 4.5 WLost 12
W#1 DoublesAudrey Smith / Jennifer Naso vs Shuofei Gao / Nefertiti Greene6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKristen Zallo / Irina ARGESEANU vs Lynn Lewis / Simone Ririmasse1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBridget Nuess / Maureen Winner vs Renee Cohen / Laila Worrell2-6, 0-6
2026-02-01vs Sportime Harbor IslandWon 10
W#2 DoublesPatricia Jones / Julie Albright vs Lee Wipper / Alison Bonaviso6-2, 6-0
2026-01-11vs WTC: Tri-4.0 The FUNdamentalistsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSondra Lavin / Jennifer Naso vs Laurie Hoffman / Laura Cramer3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIrina ARGESEANU / Kristen Zallo vs Megan Kerr / Katie Walbridge6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBridget Bennett / Tara Pisani vs Kate Menz / Irene Briganti6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Jennifer Naso
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Audrey Smith
published 4
3.70
Claudia Trulli
published 4
3.62
Sondra Lavin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
ANNIE KATZENBERG
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Meredith Safer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Kristen Zallo
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Irina ARGESEANU
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Megan Brausa
published
2.98
Peggy Schecter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Patricia Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Kate Hofmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Bridget Bennett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Tara Pisani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alexis Daur
published 3
2.56
Brooke Brandt
published 3
2.52
Maureen Winner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Trulli + Meredith Safer6263% games+11.7% vs expected
Bridget Bennett + Tara Pisani6262% games+10.4% vs expected
Jennifer Naso + Sondra Lavin9356% games+8.9% vs expected
Audrey Smith + Jennifer Naso8352% games+6.9% vs expected
Megan Brausa + ANNIE KATZENBERG8456% games+6.1% vs expected
Bridget Bennett + Patricia Jones6452% games+3.1% vs expected
ANNIE KATZENBERG + Meredith Safer6359% games+2.9% vs expected
Bridget Bennett + Kristen Zallo044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Naso
100W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Audrey Smith
57W–27L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Claudia Trulli
68W–26L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Sondra Lavin
87W–57L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
ANNIE KATZENBERG
79W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Meredith Safer
70W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Kristen Zallo
37W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
Irina ARGESEANU
17W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.22
Megan Brausa
67W–32L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Peggy Schecter
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.98
3.5
Patricia Jones
91W–67L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.92
Kate Hofmann
37W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Bridget Bennett
139W–105L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Tara Pisani
33W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Alexis Daur
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Brooke Brandt
12W–26L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
Maureen Winner
34W–51L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Arjan Eenkema van Dijk
13W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.