Teams

GCC 3.5 Schipper

2024 Fall 39 & Over-Women-UPTA · 3.5 Women FF

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-18vs UPTA/39/Ellison/GCCWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmy Greer / Meg Hyche vs Courtney Couchell / Erin Piepkow6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLauren Demosthenes / Karen Culumovic vs Kate Gilreath / Catherine Wrenn Gibellino6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlex Burgamy / Lisa Ashmore vs Kristen Patel / Katherine Mattice7-5, 6-3
W#4 DoublesNancy Pennell / Michele Wilson vs Nancy Theodore / Suzanne Massey Schemm4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-11-11vs UPTA39/Farr/Sugar CreekLost 13
L#1 DoublesAbbe Weston / Nancy Pennell vs Laura Fee / Laura North3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Demosthenes / Sarah Kennedy vs Lonna Farr / Deb Dujardin5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlex Burgamy / Lora Schipper vs Tammy Rodgers / Susan McClure1-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesKathy Parke / Carrie Ann Twedt vs Carolyn Dowling / Jennifer Hammon6-2, 6-1
2024-11-04vs UPTA39/Close/HTSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAlex Burgamy / Amy Greer vs Jodi Hudgins / Cybil Nielsen6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Wilson / Nancy Pennell vs Judith Lofurno / Joan Close3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelley Pearson / Kathy Cottingham vs Michelle Begin / Vickie Allen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesLora Schipper / Sarah Kennedy vs Kathleen Fox / Michelle Weston2-6, 0-6
2024-10-28vs McFall/KrocSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNancy Pennell / Meg Hyche vs Devin Mequio / Jeannette Schell7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Greer / Sarah Kennedy vs Lisa Maurides / Kim McFall6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Wilson / Aimee Garrett vs Martha Gower / Jane Trexler2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#4 DoublesLora Schipper / Lisa Ashmore vs Stephanie Lucas / Lyn Boyd3-6, 2-6
2024-10-21vs UPTA39FF/Williams/KrocSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLauren Demosthenes / Karen Culumovic vs Allyn Crumpler / Tiffany Taylor6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMeg Hyche / Abbe Weston vs Jodi Hajosy / Kelsey Mathias0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCarrie Ann Twedt / Sarah Kennedy vs Anne Flink / Kimberly Halley6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesLora Schipper / Kathy Cottingham vs Erin Anderson / Megan Hoffman2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Karen Culumovic
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Carrie Ann Twedt
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Amy Greer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Carol Farnsworth
published 3.5
Abbe Weston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Aimee Garrett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Anastasia Siachos
published 3.5
3.14
Leslie Wofford
published
3.07
Alex Burgamy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Lauren Demosthenes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Meg Hyche
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.51
Lora Schipper
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kathy Cottingham
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kathy Parke
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Kelley Pearson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Ashmore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Maria Vogt
published
Megan Holekamp
published
Nancy Pennell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Pennell + Lauren Demosthenes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Culumovic
43W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Carrie Ann Twedt
19W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Amy Greer
21W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Carol Farnsworth
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Abbe Weston
0W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Aimee Garrett
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Anastasia Siachos
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leslie Wofford
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Alex Burgamy
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Lauren Demosthenes
22W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.05
Meg Hyche
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95
Lora Schipper
3W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
2.51
Kathy Cottingham
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathy Parke
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kelley Pearson
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Ashmore
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Vogt
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Holekamp
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Pennell
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.