← Teams

THPRD-Lee/Blebea

2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
NANDA SIDDAIAH
published 4
3.81
Agus Rusli
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.54
Joel Fenner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Edmund Yuan
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.37
Harish Krishnamurthy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Angie Urrutia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Cara Williams
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Hien Lu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Zhong Lei
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.91
Catherine Huang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Diana Blebea
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2025-08-03Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesAgus Rusli / Lauren Smith vs Jeff Lipke / Toni Eastwood6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTonya Halog / Hien Lu vs Ann Skoog / Sandeep Mashru6-3, 6-3
2025-07-26Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAgus Rusli / Lauren Smith vs Brad Johnson / Callen Sterling6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesEdmund Yuan / Tonya Halog vs Trina Newcomb / Pierre Burthey6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDiana Blebea / Joel Fenner vs Ryan Owens / Kara Kraft1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-07-20Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAngie Urrutia / Edmund Yuan vs Yuxia Ouyang / Xiaonan Tian6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDiana Blebea / Joel Fenner vs Jing Li / Kai Zhang6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAngie Lee / Zhong Lei vs Haihua Su / Xiaolin Nan7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-07-17Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesAgus Rusli / Lauren Smith vs Phillip Tran / LINH HO6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesEdmund Yuan / Cara Williams vs Michael Jung / Susie Lim0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNANDA SIDDAIAH / Catherine Huang vs Martin von Haartman / Jian Xu6-3, 6-3
2025-07-13Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCara Williams / Hien Lu vs Dana Nolan / Omar Martinez7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCatherine Huang / Joel Fenner vs Heather Matteri / Andy Murray6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAngie Lee / Zhong Lei vs Kelly Norling / Terence Gariety6-3, 6-1
2025-07-05Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesEdmund Yuan / Andrea Vicino vs Alma Siri / Joseph Siri6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngie Urrutia / Harish Krishnamurthy vs Paul Blankenmeister / Julie Trujillo6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDiana Blebea / Agus Rusli vs Roger Dehoog / Elicia Putnam6-1, 6-3
2025-06-22Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesCara Williams / Hien Lu vs Kelley Gaylor / Dean Gaylor6-4, 7-5
2025-06-14Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLauren Smith / Harish Krishnamurthy vs Jill Boyce / Shawn Boyce3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Huang / NANDA SIDDAIAH vs Jinmi Kemple / Ajay Kumar Tippisetti6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngie Lee / Zhong Lei vs Susan Elmer / Arjun Bilakanti7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
NANDA SIDDAIAH
69W–31L career
0%98%2%
3.82
4
Agus Rusli
178W–86L career
0%99%1%
3.81
3.5
Joel Fenner
27W–18L career · type S
0%71%29%
3.54
3.5
Edmund Yuan
113W–86L career
0%96%4%
3.40
3.5
Harish Krishnamurthy
58W–34L career
1%89%10%
3.37
3.5
Angie Urrutia
73W–39L career
0%99%1%
3.29
3.5
Cara Williams
56W–42L career
3%95%1%
3.25
3.5
Hien Lu
52W–60L career
13%87%0%
3.10
3.5
Zhong Lei
65W–39L career
35%65%0%
3.00
3
Catherine Huang
94W–61L career
0%94%6%
2.91
3
Diana Blebea
90W–67L career
3%97%0%
2.70

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.