Teams

A55 7.0W 1 WR Fink

2025 NEOTA Adult 55 & Over Summer · NEOTA A55&O 7.0 Women Evening

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-22vs NEO/McLeod/A55&Over7.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesKiyomi Fukamachi / Jo Ann FInk vs Yulia Lyublinski / Pamela Zalba2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Bucknell / Kathleen Daberko vs Elyse Gustafson / Marian Lauer1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Murphy / Peggy Garibaldi vs Cheryl Kanetsky / Lynn Sands3-6, 2-6
2025-07-15vs A55 7.0W 1 MV2 O'ShaughnessyLost 03
L#1 DoublesJo Ann FInk / Andrea Wangenheim vs Janice Schmitt / Stacy Goldberg1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKathleen Daberko / Debbie Nehls vs Deborah O'Shaughnessy / Karen Cipriani0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Garibaldi / Carol Soos vs Janet Ellen Elder / Emily Geier0-6, 2-6
2025-07-08vs A55 7.0W 1 CV PrindleLost 03
L#1 DoublesJo Ann FInk / Wendy Cohn vs Sharon Prindle / Kathy Mallak6-7, 0-2
L#2 DoublesLaTrice Shields / Patricia Nelson vs Jill Carroll / Kitty Finelli3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Schultz / Karen Trecarichi vs Karen Lovejoy / Martina Roberts7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-24vs A55 7.0W 2 PM LengelLost 03
L#1 DoublesHelen Scanlon / Jo Ann FInk vs Kelly Fatula / Mary Curtis6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Daberko / Patricia Nelson vs Jill Lengel / Bonita Teeuwen2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Fisciak-Hoffman / Carol Soos vs Mona Davis / Marcy Hughes3-6, 3-6
2025-06-17vs A55 7.0W 2 LT RugglesLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Bucknell / Helen Scanlon vs Jill Diamond / Donna Balc3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Murphy / Karen Fisciak-Hoffman vs Tracy Mathia / Danielle Simpson0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Schultz / Carol Soos vs Leslie Miller / Maureen Huscroft0-6, 0-6
2025-06-10vs A55 7.0W 2 NR GallagherLost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrea Wangenheim / LaTrice Shields vs Jean Harsar / Mary Mays6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Nehls / Patricia Nelson vs Julia Bartram / Julie Kelly5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Garibaldi / Karen Fisciak-Hoffman vs Mona Shawver / Kathy Gabriel4-6, 1-6
2025-06-03vs A55 7.0W 2 SP MichalosWon 21
W#1 DoublesKiyomi Fukamachi / Jo Ann FInk vs Angela Snowball / Michelle Blanda4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Daberko / Lisa Murphy vs Kimberly Stein / Disha Pennington1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Trecarichi / Karen Fisciak-Hoffman vs Tonya Derrig / Mary Toth1-6, 2-6
2025-05-27vs NEO/McLeod/A55&Over7.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesWendy Cohn / Jo Ann FInk vs Elyse Gustafson / Yulia Lyublinski5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaTrice Shields / Andrea Wangenheim vs Jan Kolesar / Holly Vilsack4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Fisciak-Hoffman / Lisa Murphy vs Karen McLeod / Lynn Sands2-6, 4-6
2025-05-20vs A55 7.0W 1 MV2 O'ShaughnessyLost 03
L#1 DoublesJo Ann FInk / Andrea Wangenheim vs Deborah O'Shaughnessy / Cathleen Stover4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Murphy / Debbie Nehls vs Janice Schmitt / Stacy Goldberg3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Bucknell / Kathleen Daberko vs Audrey Heckaman / Amy Zucca5-7, 4-6
2025-05-13vs A55 7.0W 1 CV PrindleLost 03
L#1 DoublesWendy Cohn / Kiyomi Fukamachi vs Kathy Mallak / Jill Carroll4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Wangenheim / LaTrice Shields vs Sharon Prindle / Sandi Ferguson7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanet Schultz / Diane Hernandez vs Karen Lovejoy / Jennifer Wilson0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · NEOTA A55&O 7.0 Women Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NEO/McLeod/A55&Over7.0W9124623253
2A55 7.0W 1 MV2 O'Shaughnessy8221922230
3A55 7.0W 2 LT Ruggles82191126230
4A55 7.0W 2 NR Gallagher55181230263
5A55 7.0W 2 PM Lengel46141636303
6A55 7.0W 1 CV Prindle37111942295
7A55 7.0W 2 SP Michalos28102040270
8A55 7.0W 1 WR Fink1932756352

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Wendy Cohn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.35
Kiyomi Fukamachi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Andrea Wangenheim
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Jo Ann FInk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Debbie Nehls
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Helen Scanlon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Christine Bucknell
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Carol Soos
published 3
2.73
Karen Trecarichi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
LaTrice Shields
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Karen Fisciak-Hoffman
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.20
Diane Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Janet Schultz
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Kathleen Daberko
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Peggy Garibaldi
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LaTrice Shields + Andrea Wangenheim1449% games+6.5% vs expected
Christine Bucknell + Kathleen Daberko4546% games+1.5% vs expected
Janet Schultz + Peggy Garibaldi4543% games−1.3% vs expected
Karen Fisciak-Hoffman + Peggy Garibaldi01431% games−11.5% vs expected
Helen Scanlon + Kiyomi Fukamachi2736% games−16.0% vs expected
Janet Schultz + Diane Hernandez1429% gamesnot enough data
Janet Schultz + Karen Fisciak-Hoffman044 matchesnot enough data
Christine Bucknell + LaTrice Shields134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Cohn
29W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.38
Kiyomi Fukamachi
41W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Andrea Wangenheim
42W–45L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.33
Jo Ann FInk
19W–37L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Debbie Nehls
12W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Helen Scanlon
27W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Christine Bucknell
42W–76L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Carol Soos
39W–32L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Trecarichi
25W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.73
LaTrice Shields
24W–61L career · 4 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.71
Karen Fisciak-Hoffman
39W–93L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
2.60
3
Diane Hernandez
17W–53L career · 6 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.20
Janet Schultz
28W–60L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Daberko
75W–120L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Garibaldi
32W–106L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.