Teams

Pretzsch 6.5 Combo 18s Wed

2023 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-09-27vs Adams 6.5 Combo 18+ WedWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarian Hogan / Maria Linden vs Stacey Russo / Kathryn Fleihan7-5, 6-1
2023-09-20vs Allred 6.5 Combo 18s WedWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarian Hogan / Jennifer Hitchcock vs Megan Noltemeyer / Kathryn Roberts6-4, 6-2
2023-08-30vs Hemric / Farley 6.5 Combo 18+ WedLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarian Hogan / Jennifer Hitchcock vs Margaret Joseph / Laura Walters5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-08-23vs Flanagan 6.5 Combo 18+WedWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarian Hogan / Jennifer Hitchcock vs Mary Winstead / Annetta Bartle6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Marian Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.33
Vangie Cruz
published
3.32
Kelen Walker
published
3.25
Nell Pretzsch
published
3.13
Carrie Tauber
published 3.5
3.05
Frida Nordmark
published 3.5
3.05
Sallie Bett Theall
published
3.04
Amy Geer
published 3.5
3.02
Kelly Albright
published
2.99
Maria Linden
published
2.83
Alisa Miller
published 3
2.57
Anne Cashion
published 3
Jenny Wonders
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nell Pretzsch + Carrie Tauber1435% gamesnot enough data
Sallie Bett Theall + Carrie Tauber213 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Albright + Alisa Miller213 matchesnot enough data
Vangie Cruz + Kelen Walker303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marian Hogan
128W–54L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.61
Vangie Cruz
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
Kelen Walker
33W–26L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
Nell Pretzsch
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Carrie Tauber
6W–19L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Frida Nordmark
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
Sallie Bett Theall
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Amy Geer
9W–17L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Kelly Albright
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
Maria Linden
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Alisa Miller
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Anne Cashion
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.57
Jenny Wonders
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.