Teams

MO/Bartram/Tri-Level3.0-4.0M

Springfield Tri-Level 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 · Men's 18 & Over 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 Tri-Level

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-10-10vs Love - SpringfieldWon 21
W#1 DoublesLuke Bowling / Caleb Buxton vs Johan Collins / Steve Seo6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGarrett Beckham / Josh Bartram vs Dennis Wells / Robert Love6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRandy Blackburn / Jeffrey Pastore vs Sagar Patel / Per Brinck4-6, 4-6
2023-09-30vs Love - SpringfieldWon 21
W#1 DoublesLuke Bowling / Mason Carlson vs Johan Collins / Steve Seo6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGarrett Beckham / Josh Bartram vs Dennis Wells / Kirk Skinner6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Pastore / Christian Casey vs Xingping Sun / Sagar Patel1-6, 1-6
2023-09-30vs Love - SpringfieldLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaleb Buxton / Mason Carlson vs Steve Seo / Johan Collins6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJosh Bartram / Garrett Beckham vs Kirk Skinner / Dennis Wells4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristian Casey / Jeffrey Pastore vs Per Brinck / Xingping Sun2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 18 & Over 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 Tri-Level have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Caleb Buxton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Garrett Beckham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jacob Decker
published 3.5
Christian Casey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jeffrey Pastore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Josh Bartram
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Luke Bowling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mason Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Randy Blackburn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josh Bartram + Garrett Beckham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caleb Buxton
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Garrett Beckham
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Jacob Decker
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Christian Casey
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeffrey Pastore
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Josh Bartram
19W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Luke Bowling
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mason Carlson
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Randy Blackburn
34W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.