Teams

Overserved 2.0 - Kasten-ACAC

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 3.5 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.60 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-08vs Burkwood - KovarcikWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Delisio / Anthony Forgey vs Abel Guzman / Joseph Golden6-4, 6-4
2025-06-01vs Ridgetop-GivenWon 50
W#1 DoublesGary Reinhardt / Gregory Cole vs Doug Blouch / Ward Hackett6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesIrvin Banks vs Ryan Gibson2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Cox / Venkatachelam Regulagedda vs Rusty Dean / Clem Ulrichs6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAnthony Forgey vs STEVEN ROBERTS6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJohn Kosco / Craig Gittelman vs Jeff Given / Stephen Waldron2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-18vs Woodlake BrukaszWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatthew Cox / Dave Bucheit vs Michael Cousineau / Alex Moss7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesIrvin Banks vs David Brukasz6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCraig Gittelman / John Kosco vs Yniel Sandberg / James Costello6-1, 6-4
2025-05-17vs 3.5 WO Boyle/SibleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnthony Forgey / John Delisio vs James Rosenstock / Matt Curtis2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-05-10vs Belmont Bombers 3.5 KingWon 31
L#1 DoublesStephen Chandler / Jonathan Meade vs Brian Cox / Jesse Gauthier4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesIrvin Banks vs Curtis Ross6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTim Kasten / Toussaint Manley vs David King / Jim Swisher4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnthony Forgey / John Kosco vs Shawkat Rana / Spencer Carter6-3, 6-1
2025-04-27vs MTC Stephens 3.5 WKENDWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Delisio / Anthony Forgey vs David Joyner / Andrew Bolyard6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesStephen Chandler / Jonathan Meade vs KANNAN VIVEKANANDAN / Saravanan Balan2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesIrvin Banks vs Gabriel Walker7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGary Reinhardt / John Kosco vs Subramaniam Arjunan / Samy Sethuraman6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDarrell Eakes vs Carlos Empeno6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDave Bucheit / Ken Hatcher vs Venkateswaran Kannan / Jeyaraj Jeyasankar6-1, 6-4
2025-04-06vs Powhatan Tennisbums - KelleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnthony Forgey / John Delisio vs Owen Daly / Walker Paxton6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Anthony Forgey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.68
Eddie Kim
published
3.54
Gary Reinhardt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Ryland Dennis
published
3.48
Irvin Banks
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.34
Tim Kasten
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Toussaint Manley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Venkatachelam Regulagedda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
John Kosco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Ken Hatcher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Darrell Eakes
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Jonathan Meade
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Dave Bucheit
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Stephen Chandler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Craig Gittelman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
John Delisio
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Kasten + Toussaint Manley4160% gamesnot enough data
John Delisio + Eddie Kim404 matchesnot enough data
Dave Bucheit + Ken Hatcher123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Forgey
33W–13L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Eddie Kim
30W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.68
Gary Reinhardt
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Ryland Dennis
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Irvin Banks
27W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Tim Kasten
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Toussaint Manley
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Venkatachelam Regulagedda
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
John Kosco
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Ken Hatcher
15W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Darrell Eakes
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Jonathan Meade
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Dave Bucheit
18W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Stephen Chandler
24W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Craig Gittelman
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
John Delisio
178W–167L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.