Teams

Shavahoes

2023 Tri-Level League · Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Terrie Butcher
published
3.77
Sarah Landry
published
3.72
Rena Nance
published
3.43
Donna Frick
published 3.5
3.36
Christine Schenk
published 3.5
3.31
Elizabeth Hurt
published 3.5
3.27
Lisa Friedrichsen
published
3.26
Celina Gale
published 3.5
3.24
Dolores Vogl
published 3.5
2.98
Gina Rodriguez
published 3
2.98
Gail Saathoff
published 3
2.95
Irma Trevino
published 3
Deb Schmid
published 3
2.67
Doreen Amft
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Irma Trevino + Gina Rodriguez11554% games+0.0% vs expected
Doreen Amft + Irma Trevino4547% games−0.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Hurt + Donna Frick5451% games−1.3% vs expected
Christine Schenk + Donna Frick123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Terrie Butcher
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
Sarah Landry
22W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Rena Nance
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Donna Frick
42W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Christine Schenk
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Elizabeth Hurt
25W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Lisa Friedrichsen
6W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Celina Gale
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Dolores Vogl
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3
Gina Rodriguez
24W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
2.98
3
Gail Saathoff
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Irma Trevino
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Deb Schmid
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Doreen Amft
18W–28L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.