Teams

Seminole Lake Kelsey

2023 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-10Won 10
W#1 SinglesMonica Barkett vs Joan Johnson6-3, 6-1
2023-06-03vs Pinellas/Cregann/40&Over3.5WSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMonica Barkett / Arlene Fricke vs Terri Baun / Kimberly Northup6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLina Chaves / Elisabeth Leitner vs Harriet Cregann / Christine Campbell1-6, 2-6
2023-05-20vs ELW FriesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMonica Barkett vs Judy Carlin1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLina Chaves / Elisabeth Leitner vs Noella Burgeson / Stacey Castellini7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-29vs Tarpon HellmersLost 01
L#3 DoublesRoxanne Ross / Sherrl Fry vs Dina Glover / Gail Eberhardt6-7, 1-6
2023-04-22vs Pinellas/Cregann/40&Over3.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesMonica Barkett / Rachel Karioki vs Dori Hazama / Gina Morgan6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-15vs ELW FriesWon 20
W#1 DoublesMonica Barkett / Kristen Shinners vs Kathleen Annichiarico / Noela Fries7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLina Chaves / Elisabeth Leitner vs Stacey Castellini / Martha Cornatzer7-5, 6-3
2023-04-08vs Belleair Del BassoSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMonica Barkett vs Lori Emery2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRoxanne Ross / Carol Vitelli vs Dawn Ameel / Yve Feinberg6-1, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Monica Barkett
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.36
Vera Dikmen
published
3.36
Deborah Bianchi
published 3.5
Arlene Fricke
published 3.5
Caroline Stupple
published 3.5
3.24
Carol Vitelli
published 3.5
3.21
Rachel Karioki
published
3.20
Terry Kelsey
published
3.17
Lina Chaves
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Kristen Shinners
published
3.04
Roxanne Ross
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sherrl Fry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Shinners + Rachel Karioki1434% games−14.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Monica Barkett
239W–135L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
Vera Dikmen
13W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Deborah Bianchi
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Arlene Fricke
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Caroline Stupple
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Carol Vitelli
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
Rachel Karioki
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Terry Kelsey
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Lina Chaves
51W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Kristen Shinners
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.10
Roxanne Ross
59W–101L career · 2 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.04
Sherrl Fry
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.