Teams

SATA/Grace Cause

2023 SATA USTA Adult 65 & Over (Women) - Spring · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Betsey Andersen
published 3.5
3.38
Liz Hagen
published
3.31
Karen Haase
published
3.28
Leigh Givens-Ulmer
published
3.25
Grace Cause
published
3.21
Denise Larson
published 3.5
3.21
Barbara Capes
published 3.5
3.13
Constance Bertkau
published 3.5
3.04
Laurie Puccini
published
3.03
Jodi Holmes
published
2.99
Jan Bishop
published
2.97
Debbie Giordan
published 3.5
2.97
Leslie Shields
published
Judith Mella
published
Nancy McGirr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Givens-Ulmer + Barbara Capes11957% games+5.3% vs expected
Barbara Capes + Liz Hagen3354% games−3.9% vs expected
Leslie Shields + Denise Larson213 matchesnot enough data
Judith Mella + Laurie Puccini033 matchesnot enough data
Grace Cause + Denise Larson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Betsey Andersen
20W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Liz Hagen
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
Karen Haase
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
Leigh Givens-Ulmer
36W–30L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Grace Cause
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Denise Larson
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Barbara Capes
20W–22L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Constance Bertkau
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
Laurie Puccini
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Jodi Holmes
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
Jan Bishop
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.99
3.5
Debbie Giordan
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.97
Leslie Shields
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.97
Judith Mella
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy McGirr
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.