Teams

BC-MCC/ChristineBucklin

2023 ADULT 55 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-06vs BC-AltaVista/TeresaCampbellWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarbara Oliker / Kimberly Graham vs Debbie Graves / Victoria Alsina6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-30vs BC-LLW-AltaVista/PollyDulinLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Bucklin / Kimberly Graham vs Kathleen Callahan / Kim Graham1-6, 2-6
2023-07-09vs BC-LLW-AltaVista/PollyDulinWon 10
W#1 DoublesKris Rone / Julie Tendoesschate vs Nancy Closson / Donna Leventhal6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-04vs BC-LLW-AltaVista/PollyDulinWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Stiles / Kimberly Graham vs Naomi Sugiura / Suzy Nyhus2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-05-13vs BC-AltaVista/TeresaCampbellLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Stiles / Kris Rone vs Teresa Campbell / Karin Chafetz2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMimi Fischer / Denise Wolf vs Xiaozhen Yuan / Elizabeth Carter2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Julie Argue
published 4
3.73
Renee Tinker
published
3.64
Kris Rone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Julie Watts
published
3.30
Annie Han
published 3.5
3.20
Kimberly Graham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Christine Bucklin
published 3.5
Julie Tendoesschate
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Stiles
published
Mimi Fischer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Terri Warren
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Julie Argue
24W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
3.91
Renee Tinker
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Kris Rone
71W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.64
Julie Watts
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.38
3.5
Annie Han
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Kimberly Graham
38W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.20
3.5
Christine Bucklin
26W–35L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Julie Tendoesschate
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mary Stiles
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mimi Fischer
16W–19L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Terri Warren
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.