Teams

TOC.Robinson

2024 CTRL Fall Singles 55 & Over · Fall Singles 55 & Over 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-13vs TOC.Hagopian-EdwardsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCecilia Edgar vs Sharon Fadelici5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesBracha Blanc vs Jeannine McClung2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-11-06vs TOC.Hagopian-EdwardsWon 21
W#1 SinglesCecilia Edgar vs Kelli Moore6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesRichelle Robinson vs Jeannine McClung3-6
W#3 SinglesJanet Ranheim vs Judith Hagopian-Edwards6-0, 6-4
2024-10-30vs TOC.Hagopian-EdwardsLost 02
L#1 SinglesBracha Blanc vs Sharon Fadelici3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJanet Ranheim vs Lisa Swank1-6, 1-6
2024-10-23vs TOC.Hagopian-EdwardsLost 01
L#2 SinglesRichelle Robinson vs Sonia Weber6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-16vs TOC.Hagopian-EdwardsWon 10
W#2 SinglesBracha Blanc vs Kelli Moore7-5, 6-3
2024-10-09Won 10
W#3 SinglesRichelle Robinson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-02vs TOC.Hagopian-EdwardsWon 10
W#3 SinglesJanet Ranheim vs Judith Hagopian-Edwards6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 55 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Rita Burgess
published
2.79
Janet Ranheim
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.79
Jill Cardella
published
2.78
Mary T Long
published
2.71
Cecilia Edgar
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.71
Richelle Robinson
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.68
Bracha Blanc
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cecilia Edgar + Bracha Blanc1643% gamesnot enough data
Cecilia Edgar + Richelle Robinson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rita Burgess
15W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Janet Ranheim
108W–113L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Jill Cardella
12W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Cecilia Edgar
284W–255L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Richelle Robinson
125W–138L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Bracha Blanc
291W–288L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.