Teams

Binderim18/WD/3-3.5-4/BTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Tri-Level 18 & Over - Women Day · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Shrev

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2025-07-25vs Hand/18/WD/2.5-3-3.5/STCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeredith Gore / Trichel Binderim vs Cindy Shaw / Jennifer Octavi6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJenifer Gordon / Brooke Romero vs Mary Helen Marrs / Abby Granger6-2, 6-1
2025-07-22vs Hooper/18/WD/2.5-3-3.5/STCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathy Benton / Lyndsey Chandler vs Courtney Matheny / Kathy Barlow6-4, 7-5
2025-07-18vs Cummer/18/WD/3-3.5-4/POTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Robinson / Trish White vs MLiss Sella / Karen McCoy6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2025-07-11vs Berry-Santos/18/WD/2.5-3-3.5/BTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMeredith Gore / Trichel Binderim vs Allison Santos / Holly Miguez3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTracy Jones / Ann Sellers vs Mary Ward / Sally Daville6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-27vs Hooper/18/WD/2.5-3-3.5/STCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRoxanne Voigt / Gina Robinson vs Kathy Barlow / Courtney Matheny6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJenifer Gordon / Jenny Rodgers vs Jocelyn Hooper / Angie Wray2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-20vs Watters/18/WD/2.5-3-3.5/POTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesTrish White / Roxanne Voigt vs Megan Stuermann / Laura Singletary2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-20vs Mitchell/18/WD/2.5-3-3.5/POTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Santos / Rachael Deere vs Caroline Marston / Lee Solis2-6, 3-6
2025-06-17vs Hooper/18/WD/2.5-3-3.5/STCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Santos / Rachael Deere vs Mary Tipton / Christie Cox6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-13vs Fulco/18/WD/3-3.5-4/STCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeredith Gore / Trichel Binderim vs Laura Gooszen / Catherine Simonton6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTracy Jones / Ann Sellers vs Leslie Crowell / Julia Bryn6-1, 6-1
2025-05-29vs Berry-Santos/18/WD/2.5-3-3.5/BTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRachael Deere / Allison Santos vs Meredith Gore / Trish White6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAnn Sellers / Jenifer Gordon vs Valarie Thiels / Aubree Bunyard6-3, 6-4
2025-05-23vs Fulco/18/WD/3-3.5-4/STCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesHolly Miguez / Lyndsey Chandler vs Kyla Fulco / Ashley Turner6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2025-05-23vs Hooper/18/WD/2.5-3-3.5/STCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Robinson / Trish White vs Mary Tipton / Kathy Barlow6-4, 6-1
2025-05-19vs Fulco/18/WD/3-3.5-4/STCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesRachael Deere / Mary Ward vs Brittany Mitchell / MLiss Sella6-3, 6-1
2025-05-16vs Watters/18/WD/2.5-3-3.5/POTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesGina Robinson / Meredith Gore vs Mary Catherine Kneip / Laura Singletary4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Carol Matthews
published 4
3.63
Ginger Gustavson
published
3.55
Kirita Windham
published
3.55
Sandra Botzong
published
3.50
Karen Pharr
published
3.44
Meredith Gore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Trish White
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Rachael Deere
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Trichel Binderim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Jenifer Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Holly Hightower
published
3.21
Lora Slack
published
3.21
Ann Sellers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Lyndsey Chandler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Gina Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Abbie Reeves
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Sellers + Meredith Gore8073% games+19.0% vs expected
Trichel Binderim + Ann Sellers4157% games+1.0% vs expected
Trichel Binderim + Meredith Gore2351% games−10.2% vs expected
Jenifer Gordon + Ann Sellers4162% gamesnot enough data
Lyndsey Chandler + Rachael Deere224 matchesnot enough data
Lyndsey Chandler + Ann Sellers224 matchesnot enough data
Lora Slack + Lyndsey Chandler213 matchesnot enough data
Lora Slack + Rachael Deere123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carol Matthews
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Ginger Gustavson
35W–26L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Kirita Windham
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Sandra Botzong
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Karen Pharr
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Meredith Gore
33W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
Trish White
65W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Rachael Deere
66W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Trichel Binderim
27W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Jenifer Gordon
42W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Holly Hightower
27W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Lora Slack
34W–39L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Ann Sellers
45W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Lyndsey Chandler
32W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Gina Robinson
30W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3
Abbie Reeves
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.