Teams

SD 7.0 Peninsula TC (2:30PM)/ Stacy

2024 Adult 55 & Over Summer Women's WE SD · SDNC

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Diana Kirkland
published 4
3.53
Cherie Hibbs
published 4
3.24
Pam Trent
published 3.5
3.23
Dianne Randquist
published 3.5
3.07
Alicia Burnes
published 3
3.06
Janet Bergland
published 3
2.95
Lisa Serrano
published
2.71
Elayne Berman
published 3
2.67
Laura Stacy
published
2.62
Karen Axmann
published 3
Rebecca Riley
published
Zahira Vargas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alicia Burnes + Janet Bergland11266% games+11.7% vs expected
Elayne Berman + Janet Bergland8951% games−0.2% vs expected
Dianne Randquist + Pam Trent51541% games−14.2% vs expected
Elayne Berman + Karen Axmann2434% gamesnot enough data
Cherie Hibbs + Pam Trent5082% gamesnot enough data
Diana Kirkland + Karen Axmann033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Kirkland
47W–102L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Cherie Hibbs
63W–41L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Pam Trent
53W–65L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Dianne Randquist
40W–52L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Alicia Burnes
33W–49L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Janet Bergland
79W–61L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.06
Lisa Serrano
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Elayne Berman
70W–62L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
Laura Stacy
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Karen Axmann
46W–68L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
2.62
Rebecca Riley
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Zahira Vargas
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.