Teams

VAC-Peters/Gunderson

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Randy Holmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Barron Willis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.67
Robert Peters
published 3
Results6 ties
2024-06-15Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRandy Holmer / Mark Dodson vs Danny Severns / Dallas Sloan6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBENJAMIN MERRIFIELD / Barron Willis vs JIKUO Lu / Jeremy Kasa7-5, 6-2
2024-05-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesRandy Holmer / Mark Dodson vs Daniel Silberman / Eric Rader6-3, 6-2
2024-05-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBarron Willis / Mark Dodson vs Jeremy Kasa / Brian Devereux6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-05Lost 01
L#2 SinglesBarron Willis vs Paul Detering6-2, 6-2
2024-04-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRandy Holmer / BENJAMIN MERRIFIELD vs Anderson Durham / Mark Nielsen6-4, 6-1
2024-04-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBarron Willis / Robert Peters vs Mike Abrams / David Nemetz6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Randy Holmer
126W–67L career
0%86%14%
2.98
3
Barron Willis
41W–45L career
0%97%3%
2.85
3
Robert Peters
22W–20L career
4%96%0%
2.67

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.