Teams

Greenhill/Nottingham W4.0S

2022 DTA 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Charlotte Rice
published 4
3.78
Tanya Clay
published
3.77
Brooke Parks
published 4
3.73
Katie Mayer
published
3.71
Lia Allen
published
3.70
Theresa Batoon
published
3.56
Robyn Krivacic
published
3.54
Kayla Chen
published
3.41
Hollee Voisinet
published 3.5
3.35
Sheri Colaluca
published
3.15
Deanna Harp
published 3.5
Jennifer Richter
published
June Cliff
published
Kelly Nottingham
published
Margaret Hoyt
published
Wendy Korenman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanya Clay + Lia Allen3251% games−4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlotte Rice
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
Tanya Clay
19W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Brooke Parks
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Katie Mayer
22W–10L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Lia Allen
23W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Theresa Batoon
33W–24L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Robyn Krivacic
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.56
Kayla Chen
27W–18L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Hollee Voisinet
20W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Sheri Colaluca
17W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Deanna Harp
13W–26L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Jennifer Richter
24W–35L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
June Cliff
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly Nottingham
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Margaret Hoyt
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Korenman
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.