Teams

TLMSmith/LNTC

2022 Lake USTA Tri Level Level 18 & Over · Women's Group B 3.0, 3.5 & 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-08-03vs TLHHughes/EdgemoorWon 10
W#2 DoublesBuket Boucher / Jane Heredia vs Lane Wallace / Shari Graham6-1, 6-4
2022-07-27vs TLSClancy/EdgemoorWon 10
W#2 DoublesBuket Boucher / Jane Heredia vs Karen Allison / Teresa Pal6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-20vs TLLSchacher/TrumpLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeah Russell / Buket Boucher vs Katrina Childers / Joan Stolberg6-7, 4-6
2022-07-13vs TLJYAUDES/JettonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelissa Smith / MaryGwen Murash vs Mary Kay Portaro / Andrea Griffin2-6, 4-6
2022-07-06vs TLCPoell/HolbrookWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Smith / Jane Heredia vs Sheryl Chapman / Janice Ingram6-4, 6-3
2022-06-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesMaryGwen Murash / Jane Heredia vs Lindsey Schumacher / Ruth Suddreth6-3, 6-4
2022-06-22vs TLAndiloro Darnell/LNTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Smith / Jane Heredia vs Noreen Soos / Julie Coughlin6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-15vs TLSBeatdslee/ WestportWon 10
W#2 DoublesJane Heredia / Leah Russell vs Rhonda Wood / Valerie Link6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-08vs TLCBogojevich/CSDLost 01
L#2 DoublesBuket Boucher / Jane Heredia vs Elizabeth Born / Victoria Peaire3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Group B 3.0, 3.5 & 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
MaryGwen Murash
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Leah Russell
published
3.46
Buket Boucher
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.43
Tracey McKenna
published
3.40
Mary Beth Thomas
published
3.37
Erika Buchholz
published 3.5
3.27
Jayme Lemke
published
3.25
Jane Heredia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.64
Beth Welch
published 3
2.49
Christine Dacko
published 3
Melissa Kuran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Heredia + Buket Boucher4256% gamesnot enough data
Jane Heredia + MaryGwen Murash213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
MaryGwen Murash
133W–111L career · 6 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Leah Russell
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Buket Boucher
122W–76L career · 7 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.46
Tracey McKenna
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
Mary Beth Thomas
0W–10L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Erika Buchholz
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Jayme Lemke
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Jane Heredia
134W–122L career · 7 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Beth Welch
8W–16L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Christine Dacko
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.49
Melissa Kuran
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.