Teams

Losack/Cromer - TRC

2026 NETX Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 12 9:00 AM
Tyler Racquet Club
Sep 26 9:00 AM
Tyler Racquet Club
Oct 3 9:00 AM
Faulkner Tennis Center
Oct 10 9:00 AM
Faulkner Tennis Center
2026-08-29vs Green -FaulknerWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeannie Williams / Cindy Coleman vs Deborah Lowe / Shannon Lutmer6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnn Skogerboe / Stacy Cromer vs Nina Martin / Mary Dyess6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Cook / Pam Phinny vs Linda Miller / Suzy Trimble3-6, 4-6
2026-08-22vs Green -FaulknerLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Losack / Ann Skogerboe vs Janice Rogers / Suzy Trimble6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStacy Cromer / Joyce Mallory vs Shannon Lutmer / Yumiko Green6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKaren Cook / Jerriann Townsend vs Deborah Lowe / Nina Martin5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Losack/Cromer - TRC000000
2Green -Faulkner000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Ann Skogerboe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.47
Joyce Mallory
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Cindy Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Jeannie Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Stacy Cromer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Connie McMillin
published 3.5
3.03
Jill Hamil
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Lisa Losack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Judy Tschirhart
published
2.78
Jane Ball
published
Jerriann Townsend
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Pam Phinny
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeannie Williams + Cindy Coleman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Skogerboe
20W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Joyce Mallory
26W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Cindy Coleman
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
Jeannie Williams
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Stacy Cromer
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Connie McMillin
3W–11L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
Jill Hamil
38W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Lisa Losack
41W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Judy Tschirhart
0W–7L career · no lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88
3
Ana Baker Dassonville
4W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
Jane Ball
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jerriann Townsend
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Pam Phinny
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.