Teams

1-JByrd/Naftel4.5-Eno

2023 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Men-Evening

9 players · average NTRP 4.57 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-20vs 3-JWolfe-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulien de la Mettrie / Herman Naftel vs Jake Wolfe / Parker Sheridan6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Peter Hull vs Justin Fowler / Daniel Allen6-1, 7-5
2023-04-06vs 2-RMcClenny-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulien de la Mettrie / Peter Hull vs Jason Abhau / Simon Cagle6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Beomjun Ju vs Patrick Newsome / Erik J Erikson3-6, 6-7
2023-03-30vs 3-JWolfe-EnoSplit 11
W#2 DoublesHerman Naftel / Jackson Naftel vs Aneesh Kodali / Justin Fowler6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesTommy Hibbs / Jermaine Byrd vs Tyler Newman / Joe Twer7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-16vs 2-RMcClenny-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeter Hull / Jackson Naftel vs Richard McClenny / Connor Wilkins6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-03-13vs 2-RMcClenny-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Richard Papantonis2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Curtis Lawson vs Richard McClenny / Connor Wilkins1-6, 3-6
2023-03-09vs 3-JWolfe-EnoWon 20
W#2 DoublesHerman Naftel / Jackson Naftel vs Tyler Newman / Jake Wolfe7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Curtis Lawson vs Kyle Couch / Parker Sheridan7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Men-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.86
Julien de la Mettrie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.44
Andrew Perdue
published 4.5
4.21
Kenneth Nelson
published
4.21
Casey Black
published 4.5
4.18
Matthew Hanauer
usually #1 Singles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.18
Jackson Naftel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
Beomjun Ju
published 4.5
4.04
Jermaine Byrd
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
Henry Kennelly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jermaine Byrd + Julien de la Mettrie4181% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Julien de la Mettrie
77W–20L career · 6 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.86
4.5
Andrew Perdue
33W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
4.44
Kenneth Nelson
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Casey Black
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Matthew Hanauer
162W–105L career · 10 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Jackson Naftel
66W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Beomjun Ju
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · 7 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.04
Henry Kennelly
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.