Teams

Dalziel

2026 Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Adult 18 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-09-03vs Garrison 7.5 18+Won 30
W#1 DoublesMolly Mason / Kalyn Robbins vs Sharon Garrison / Tracey Marcu6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCasey McKean / Brilee Barksdale vs Shannon Clemmons / Lauren Buckner6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDonna Barksdale / Julia Matthews vs Jana Killen / Blake Stone6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-27vs Garrison 7.5 18+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesClaire Mitchell / Casey McKean vs Shannon Clemmons / Lauren Buckner1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMolly Mason / Kalyn Robbins vs Sharon Garrison / Jana Melton6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesTonya Shelton / Julia Matthews vs Cynthia Fennel / Heather Young6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-08-13vs Garrison 7.5 18+Split 11
L#1 DoublesDonna Barksdale / Heather Fleming vs Shannon Clemmons / Lauren Buckner7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCasey McKean / Claire Mitchell vs Cynthia Fennel / Abbi Holley6-4, 6-1
2026-08-06vs Garrison 7.5 18+Won 20
W#2 DoublesDonna Barksdale / Casey McKean vs Jana Killen / Jana Melton7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTonya Shelton / Julia Matthews vs Cynthia Fennel / Lynette Horton6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Adult 18 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Stephanie James
published
3.85
Donna Barksdale
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Tonya Shelton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Casey McKean
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Valerie Oakley
published
3.32
Julia Matthews
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Kalyn Robbins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Oakley + Stephanie James7356% games+8.2% vs expected
Casey McKean + Julia Matthews28760% games+5.1% vs expected
Casey McKean + Stephanie James303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie James
27W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Donna Barksdale
49W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
Tonya Shelton
33W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Casey McKean
52W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
Valerie Oakley
42W–31L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Julia Matthews
46W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Kalyn Robbins
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.