Teams

Battle/Memphis

2026 Mixed 18 & Over - Memphis · 2.5 Mixed 18 & Over

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-21vs Fly/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarter Ricks / Casey Gleysteen vs Ben Gilluly / Sydney Gilluly6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Allison Becksfort / Elliott Dent vs Kevan Hatamzadeh / Sarah Murphy6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFrancis Mcrae / Louis Connelly vs Michael Pagliari / Allison King4-6, 4-6
2026-07-18vs Plummer/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAddison Garcia / Casey Gleysteen vs Chad Collett / Rachel Spangler6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLouis Connelly / Sarah Stuart vs Nicholas Newsom / Amber Sand0-6, 1-6
2026-06-27vs Silk/MemphisLost 01
L#3 DoublesLouis Connelly / Dana Daly vs Nathan Evans / Francesca Bengert3-6, 1-6
2026-06-24vs Plummer/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesAllie Olson Battle / Elliott Dent vs LV Plummer / Amber Sand6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPreston Battle / Dana Daly vs Justin Elliott / Kelli Cook1-6, 3-6
2026-06-17vs Fly/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesCasey Gleysteen / Elliott Dent vs Colleen Wilson / Joshua Shipley4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAllie Olson Battle / Louis Connelly vs Allison King / Stephen Fly1-6, 2-6
2026-06-06vs Silk/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Allison Becksfort / Elliott Dent vs Paul Shifflet / Kate Sullivan2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCarter Ricks / Francis Mcrae vs Jennie Silk / James Michael Silk5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fly/Memphis4211716152
2Plummer/Memphis4212617141
3Silk/Memphis339919141
4Battle/Memphis1541432203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.37
Elliott Dent
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.33
Louis Connelly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Francis Mcrae
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.18
Casey Gleysteen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.07
Dana Daly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elliott Dent
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
Louis Connelly
1W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.33
Francis Mcrae
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Casey Gleysteen
13W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Dana Daly
3W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.