Teams

Isles Of Collier - M. Young

2024 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-15vs Pelican Marsh - WhalenLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Ginzburg / Suzanne O'Neill vs Joyce Bunting / Helen Wardell1-6, 1-6
2024-03-08vs Village Walk Bonita - J. MartinWon 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Ginzburg / Suzanne O'Neill vs Janet Martin / Vicki MacE5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-03-05vs Bay Colony - RatnerWon 10
W#1 DoublesMonique Berlinger / Pamela Ginzburg vs Laurie Hanson / Kim Robb6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-03-01vs Royal Poinciana - DentonLost 01
L#2 DoublesPamela Ginzburg / Adrienne Woodward vs Maureen Sippel / Mary Harvey6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-02-23vs Sterling Oaks - BergstromWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanne O'Neill / Pamela Ginzburg vs Sarah Bergstrom / DEBORAH Eck6-2, 6-3
2024-02-09vs Hammock Bay - CraneWon 10
W#1 DoublesMonique Berlinger / Pamela Ginzburg vs Jacquie Currie / Susan Gruber6-0, 6-2
2024-01-23vs COLLIER/K.Keillor/55&over6.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Ginzburg / Suzanne O'Neill vs Cheryl Copps / Cory Witters2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-01-12vs Valencia Bonita - YagodaLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Hayes / Pamela Ginzburg vs Shirley Yagoda / Bobbi Burnett6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Pamela Ginzburg
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
2.93
Monique Berlinger
published
2.91
Suzanne O'Neill
published
2.80
Carol Garrison
published 3
2.70
2.41
Michelle Young
published
Lisa Hayes
published
Lorraine Bigelow
published
Mary Horn
published
Nina Savoca
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrienne Woodward + Nina Savoca303 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Ginzburg + Lorraine Bigelow123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Pamela Ginzburg
98W–87L career · 11 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
Monique Berlinger
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Suzanne O'Neill
13W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Carol Garrison
39W–49L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Adrienne Woodward
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
Michelle Young
10W–24L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.41
Lisa Hayes
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lorraine Bigelow
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Horn
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nina Savoca
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.