Teams

LWR Vavrek

2025 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 7.0 W Wednesday

10 players · average NTRP 3.43 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-04-02vs LBK Public AssalyWon 10
W#1 DoublesRegina Beatty / Karen Patchell vs Jeanne Jankowski / Nancy McLean6-3, 6-2
2025-03-26vs LBK Club HowardWon 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Armiak / Jeanne Shklyar vs Ann Miklas / Cyn Gillespie6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-03-19vs LWR SteffensLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Vavrek / Karen Patchell vs Cindy Davis / Beth Hill3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTeri MacAulay / Jeanne Shklyar vs Loel Davenport / Debbie Bieringer6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLinda Armiak / Jeanne OConnor vs Nancy Bartlett / DeAnne Fischer6-7, 4-6
2025-03-05vs Stoneybrook YoungSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRegina Beatty / Cindy Vavrek vs Karin Dayton / Andrea Anderson1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Armiak / Jeanne Shklyar vs Debbie French / Stephanie Young6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-26vs GT Bray PauleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesRegina Beatty / Karen Patchell vs Lisa Simotes / Faye Blakely2-6, 4-6
2025-02-19vs LWN ArringtonLost 03
L#1 DoublesRegina Beatty / Cindy Vavrek vs Sherry Chase / Tammy Hallam5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Crawford / Jeanne Shklyar vs Carol Williams-Cameron / Rita Battaglia6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Armiak / Cheryl Burton vs Stephanie Johnston Reith / Mary Klueh6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-12vs University Park GiaimoWon 20
W#2 DoublesSarah Crawford / Jeanne Shklyar vs Paula Lapierre / Terry Williamson2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Armiak / Jeanne OConnor vs Molly Moore / Deborah Lionetti6-0, 6-3
2025-02-05vs Courtside KennedySplit 11
L#1 DoublesSarah Crawford / Jeanne Shklyar vs Belinda Alexander / Tracey Kehoe2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLinda Armiak / Jeanne OConnor vs Karen Kennedy / Patty Buggy2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-04vs IslandWalk QuandtSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLinda Armiak / Jeanne Shklyar vs Janet McLellan / Laura Walczak3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRegina Beatty / Karen Patchell vs Audrey Sansotta-Weiss / Linda Sleet6-2, 6-2
2025-01-29vs Sarasota/Kersten/55&Over7.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRegina Beatty / Cindy Vavrek vs Sherri Archondo / Heather Boccia6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTeri MacAulay / Jeanne Shklyar vs Lynn Bucknam / Pauline Daintith6-3, 7-5
2025-01-15vs Royal PayneLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Patchell / Cindy Vavrek vs Linda Evans / Jo Anne Cullen6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRegina Beatty / Sarah Crawford vs Pamela Mousseau / Lynn Heinz7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-01-08Split 11
W#1 DoublesSarah Crawford / Karen Patchell vs Lisa Adams / Robin Purcell6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCyndi Paxton / Jeanne Shklyar vs Colette Nemni / Cynthia Strathmann3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Karen Patchell
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.46
Teri MacAulay
published
3.40
Regina Beatty
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.39
Jeanne OConnor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Jeanne Shklyar
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.27
Linda Armiak
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.23
Sarah Crawford
published
3.07
Gina Ferlise
published
3.07
Cheryl Burton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Cyndi Paxton
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne OConnor + Linda Armiak12855% games+2.5% vs expected
Gina Ferlise + Cyndi Paxton5152% gamesnot enough data
Regina Beatty + Karen Patchell314 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Shklyar + Teri MacAulay314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karen Patchell
87W–61L career · 6 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Teri MacAulay
78W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Regina Beatty
58W–39L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Jeanne OConnor
107W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Jeanne Shklyar
29W–24L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Linda Armiak
126W–106L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Sarah Crawford
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Gina Ferlise
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Cheryl Burton
10W–1L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Cyndi Paxton
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.