Teams

New Territory - Lobsters

2025 HTA Spring NA - Men's Doubles Thursday · 4.0 Men's Doubles

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-06vs LLTC - LigmasWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristopher Russell / Ruben Alvarez vs Shane Spruiell / Thomas Ngo6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAshish Parikh / Austin Brayley vs Michail Danos / Wayne Tie3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Espinosa / Ajith Gorijala vs Max Deleon / Grant Hinds7-5, 6-3
L#4 DoublesRussell Waehler / Amit Saxena vs Vu Do / Christopher Murphy2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men's Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amit Saxena
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Ashish Parikh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Jesus Reyes
published
3.61
Andrew Vong
published 4
3.59
Austin Brayley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Ruben Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Michael de Moya
published
3.58
Ajith Gorijala
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Daniel Espinosa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Russell Waehler
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael de Moya + Russell Waehler5248% games+0.8% vs expected
Jesus Reyes + Andrew Vong2644% games−5.7% vs expected
Austin Brayley + Ruben Alvarez3445% games−12.2% vs expected
Jesus Reyes + Michael de Moya2736% games−13.0% vs expected
Ashish Parikh + Russell Waehler1538% gamesnot enough data
Ashish Parikh + Ajith Gorijala3256% gamesnot enough data
Ajith Gorijala + Russell Waehler2343% gamesnot enough data
Ashish Parikh + Austin Brayley224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amit Saxena
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Christopher Russell
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Ashish Parikh
18W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Jesus Reyes
9W–19L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Andrew Vong
8W–16L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Austin Brayley
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
Ruben Alvarez
17W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Michael de Moya
12W–17L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Ajith Gorijala
12W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Daniel Espinosa
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Russell Waehler
12W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.