Teams

UPTA65A/Mccarthy/Reserve

2025 UPTA Adult 65 & Over - SC · 65+ Women - 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesBeverly Gibbs / Kathy Mendel vs Carol Eggleton / Diane Zeager6-3, 6-4
2025-06-10vs UPTA65A/Jenkins/BrookstoneWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeverly Gibbs / Kim Smentek vs Phyllis Spearman / Linda Musgrave6-1, 6-4
2025-05-20vs UPTA65A/Hannah/Tryon parkWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathy Mendel / Beverly Gibbs vs Hoi Nguyen / Sue Hammond6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65+ Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Beverly Gibbs
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Kim Smentek
published
Alleta McKeon
published 3
2.55
Candice Limousin
published 3
2.51
Kathy Mendel
published
2.19
Kathleen Stetson
published
2.16
Debra Michalovsky
published 2.5
Sandra Lewis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Mendel + Candice Limousin2443% games−10.0% vs expected
Debra Michalovsky + Kathleen Stetson0523% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Beverly Gibbs
74W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Kim Smentek
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Alleta McKeon
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Candice Limousin
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Kathy Mendel
4W–15L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
Kathleen Stetson
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.19
2.5
Debra Michalovsky
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Sandra Lewis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.