Teams

Planet Swim - Eulenfeld

2026 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over

19 players · average NTRP 2.88 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-17vs FYC - TorresWon 41
L#1 DoublesTory Eulenfeld / Kagin DiBella vs Katrina Torres / Lauren Griffith1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Hanson vs Tara Volpe6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSamantha Vanderbilt / Nelda Guerra-Smith vs Sally Peebles / Raeanne McCarty6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarnie Giancola / Rebecca Roberts vs Adrienne Kent / Claire Do6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesJulie Clampitt / Sheila Pensotti vs Sara Bertoch / Gina Bradley6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-02-22vs Palencia - MartyakWon 31
W#1 DoublesSamantha Vanderbilt / Cheryl Mosley vs Laura Jimenez / Michelle Meyer-Devlin6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRebecca Roberts / Julie Clampitt vs Samantha Leigh Davis / Iulia Platte6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTory Eulenfeld / Tamara Kennedy vs Sarah Ferrer-Bruker / Alexis Kokolias6-4, 7-6
L#4 DoublesScottie May / Brooke Tsao vs Jennifer Erwin / Deborah Storlie4-6, 1-6
2026-01-25vs Duval/BoretskyLost 14
L#1 DoublesTory Eulenfeld / Marissa Alex vs Elizabeth Andersen / Narong Khan6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Hanson vs Mandy Riceman5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Henley / Samantha Vanderbilt vs Patricia Lombardo / Cara Wittmann6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBrooke Tsao / Nelda Guerra-Smith vs Jacqueline Boretsky / Brenda Byman5-7, 2-6
L#4 DoublesRebecca Roberts / Jennifer Losch vs Stephanie Herr / Richa Jeetah7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2026-01-11vs San Jose - de AndradeSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTory Eulenfeld / Samantha Vanderbilt vs Jami Bueker / Carissa Hammel6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Hanson vs Amy Malaikham6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSheila Pensotti / Marissa Alex vs Phyllis Crabtree / Melanie McGrath3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMarnie Giancola / Julie Clampitt vs Dixie McDaniel de Andrade / Cynthia Hodges6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Sarah Hanson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.00
Cheryl Mosley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Julie Clampitt
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Kristyn Roseborough
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Samantha Vanderbilt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Amy Henley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Arrate Reich
published 3
2.72
Sheila Pensotti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Marissa Alex
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.70
Jennifer Losch
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Tory Eulenfeld
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
2.68
Marnie Giancola
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Tamara Kennedy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Nelda Guerra-Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Brooke Tsao
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Kagin DiBella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mae Coleman
published
Maggie MacElt
published
Scottie May
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marnie Giancola + Julie Clampitt213 matchesnot enough data
Samantha Vanderbilt + Amy Henley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Hanson
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Cheryl Mosley
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Julie Clampitt
17W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94
Kristyn Roseborough
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Samantha Vanderbilt
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.79
3
Amy Henley
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Arrate Reich
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sheila Pensotti
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Marissa Alex
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%6%94%
2.72
Jennifer Losch
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Tory Eulenfeld
11W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%9%91%
2.69
Marnie Giancola
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%10%90%
2.68
Tamara Kennedy
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Nelda Guerra-Smith
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%25%75%
2.60
2.5
Brooke Tsao
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
Kagin DiBella
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mae Coleman
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Maggie MacElt
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Scottie May
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.