Teams

Guillet/18s/6.5/COQ

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Harrison
published 3
2.44
Angelique Nicotri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Eryn Brannagan
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jaime Guillet
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Jennifer Harty
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jennifer Olivier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Leslie Broussard
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Lisa Goodgion
published
Mary Leigh Fitzmorris
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 30% · published
Mikayla Berry
published
SHELLY GALLARDO
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #3 Doubles 45% · published
Suzanne Parke
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jaime Guillet + Eryn Brannagan1537% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Harty + Eryn Brannagan044 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Harty + Jennifer Olivier033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Harrison
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Angelique Nicotri
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%66%34%
2.44
Eryn Brannagan
13W–16L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jaime Guillet
8W–16L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Harty
4W–23L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Olivier
5W–26L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Broussard
11W–18L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Goodgion
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Leigh Fitzmorris
9W–5L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mikayla Berry
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
SHELLY GALLARDO
12W–49L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Parke
4W–27L career · 30 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.