Teams

SD 3.5 Balboa Breakers (9AM)/ Mallory

2024 SoCal Fall Doubles SD WE · SD Men 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-17vs SD 3.5 CTC/ CHS (10:30AM)/ KamasLost 01
L#3 DoublesTodd Bartholomew / Jason Brigham vs Dee Domingo / Jeremy HACKWORTH2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Chaiwimol / Joseph Kemery Jr vs Robert Boyhan / Brant Robinson3-6, 6-7
2024-11-03vs SD 3.5 LJ B&TC (2PM)/ McGowanLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Chaiwimol / Michael Avila vs Luke Daniels / Oliver Kearney1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Dunn / Jason Brigham vs Jerome Chang / Philip Mykel Flores0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTony Andrade / Joseph Kemery Jr vs Jon Cieslak / John Evans4-6, 1-6
2024-10-13vs SD 3.5 UCRC (12PM)/ ChinLost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Brigham / Jeffrey Penick vs Arjay Mendoza / Bhargava Sana1-6, 3-6
2024-09-29vs SD 3.5 LJ B&TC (2PM)/ McGowanLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoseph Kemery Jr / Michael Chaiwimol vs Oliver Kearney / Daniel Ryan0-6, 1-6
2024-09-22vs SD 3.5 SDTRC (9AM)/ RussellLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Chaiwimol / Tony Andrade vs Ramiro Muzquiz / Russell Austin1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJason Brigham / Ryan Mallory vs Jeremy Turner / Steve Gill1-6, 3-6
2024-09-15Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJoseph Kemery Jr / Jeffrey Penick vs Nick Reale / Ryan Williams1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Alex Trejo
published 3.5
3.35
Ryan Mallory
published
3.10
Michael Speck
published
3.08
Jeffrey Penick
published
3.04
Cesar Cahue
published 3.5
2.98
Tony Andrade
published
2.81
Jason Brigham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Joseph Kemery Jr
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.73
Michael Chaiwimol
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Patrick Mallory
published
Todd Bartholomew
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Chaiwimol + Joseph Kemery Jr134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alex Trejo
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
Ryan Mallory
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
Michael Speck
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
Jeffrey Penick
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Cesar Cahue
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.04
Tony Andrade
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.98
3
Jason Brigham
9W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Joseph Kemery Jr
22W–39L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Michael Chaiwimol
45W–51L career · 8 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Patrick Mallory
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Todd Bartholomew
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.