Teams

Davis Island Serve Aces - L. Nero

2021 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesBright Owens / Amy Quinn vs Carol Guidera / Tricia Cardoso6-4, 6-1
2021-05-03vs VD Farms - P. MooreWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Nero / Bright Owens vs Bridget Harrison / Suzanne Huffman6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesTobey Hartigan / Carole Jahns vs Roseann McNichol / Amy Rairigh6-3, 6-2
2021-04-23vs Cheval - B. BurdetteLost 01
L#1 DoublesBright Owens / Amy Parmer vs Jacqueline Hayes / Vera Trayner7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2021-04-16vs FH Sweetspots - C. DemingLost 01
L#1 DoublesTobey Hartigan / Bright Owens vs Monica Eiermann / Deb Spears1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-04-05vs Grand Hampton - BacardiWon 10
W#3 DoublesTobey Hartigan / Amy Rosewater vs Raquel Mateos / Marieglory Quinones4-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Katherine Cowley
published 3.5
3.39
Vera Dikmen
published
3.24
Yenny Velez
published
3.12
Bright Owens
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.09
Carole Jahns
published 3.5
2.97
Tobey Hartigan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.89
Lara Saade
published
2.87
Lisa Nero
published
Amy Rosewater
published 3
2.65
Amy Parmer
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tobey Hartigan + Katherine Cowley3846% gamesnot enough data
Tobey Hartigan + Bright Owens134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katherine Cowley
83W–43L career · no lines in 2021
<1%55%45%
3.48
Vera Dikmen
13W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
Yenny Velez
10W–8L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Bright Owens
55W–67L career · 7 lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Carole Jahns
68W–39L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Tobey Hartigan
105W–94L career · 5 lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
2.97
Lara Saade
6W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
2.89
Lisa Nero
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Amy Rosewater
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Amy Parmer
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.