Teams

Tita Connection

2024 Adult 40 and Over League · 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.95 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-13vs Tita TooWon 21
L#1 SinglesDeborah Hashimoto-Skorikov vs Rebecca Daniel1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSheri Kinoshita / Karyn Tada vs Carolyn Goff / Ai Chir Magliulo6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNorine Parish / Andrea Ueno vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-10vs Tita TooLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeresa Doak / Mari Horike vs Rebecca Daniel / Sheila Tamura7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEsther Hughes / Judith Jennet vs Lori Nekoba / Rhonda Zavarro6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNina Segawa / Karyn Tada vs Tomoko Fuselier / Ai Chir Magliulo6-2, 6-2
2024-02-25vs Tita TooLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeresa Doak / Karyn Tada vs Liane Martin / Sheila Tamura5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDeborah Hashimoto-Skorikov vs JENNY NISHIDA5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNorine Parish / Donna Shibuya vs Tomoko Fuselier / Carolyn Goff6-1, 6-0
2024-02-11vs Tita TooSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLiane Depontes / Nina Segawa vs Liane Martin / Lori Nekoba2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJudith Jennet vs JENNY NISHIDA1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa Doak / Mari Horike vs Rebecca Daniel / Rhonda Zavarro6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Lei Ishikawa / Andrea Ueno vs Frances Calantoc / Ai Chir Magliulo7-6, 6-0
2024-01-28vs Tita TooWon 40
W#1 DoublesTeresa Doak / Sheri Kinoshita vs Liane Martin / Rhonda Zavarro6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJudith Jennet vs Ai Chir Magliulo6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDeborah Hashimoto-Skorikov / Donna Shibuya vs Rebecca Daniel / Carolyn Goff6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMari Horike / Lisa Lei Ishikawa vs Amy Brotzman / JENNY NISHIDA6-1, 6-4
2024-01-21vs Tita TooWon 40
W#1 DoublesNina Segawa / Donna Shibuya vs Liane Martin / Merle Yoshino6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesJudith Jennet vs Sheila Tamura6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMari Horike / Sheri Kinoshita vs Frances Calantoc / Carolyn Goff6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEsther Hughes / Karyn Tada vs Amy Brotzman / Rhonda Zavarro6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Mari Horike
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Sheri Kinoshita
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Shauna Miller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Nina Segawa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Karyn Tada
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Teresa Doak
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Esther Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Deborah Hashimoto-Skorikov
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Donna Shibuya
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Judith Jennet
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Norine Parish
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Andrea Ueno
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Liane Depontes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Lei Ishikawa
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Jennet + Liane Depontes11358% games+2.7% vs expected
Mari Horike + Donna Shibuya3260% games+2.3% vs expected
Sheri Kinoshita + Nina Segawa5259% games+1.1% vs expected
Esther Hughes + Karyn Tada4160% games−3.2% vs expected
Sheri Kinoshita + Teresa Doak6157% games−3.8% vs expected
Nina Segawa + Karyn Tada4256% games−4.3% vs expected
Donna Shibuya + Norine Parish3645% games−5.2% vs expected
Deborah Hashimoto-Skorikov + Karyn Tada6750% games−7.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mari Horike
86W–84L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Sheri Kinoshita
179W–143L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Shauna Miller
66W–71L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Nina Segawa
89W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Karyn Tada
51W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Teresa Doak
66W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Esther Hughes
34W–29L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Deborah Hashimoto-Skorikov
37W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Donna Shibuya
33W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Judith Jennet
125W–106L career · 4 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.56
Norine Parish
17W–40L career · 1 line in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Andrea Ueno
46W–64L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.08
Liane Depontes
24W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Lei Ishikawa
53W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.