Teams

Jacobsen-Slice Girls

2024 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Clare Belott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Monique Gill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Margaret Jacobsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results7 ties
2024-08-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesClare Belott / Jessica Padnick vs Greta Miracle / Monica Conners6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-08-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesMargaret Jacobsen / Monique Gill vs Geri Marcus / Anita Heredia6-1, 6-4
2024-08-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesClare Belott / Jessica Padnick vs Ivy Lane / Sharon Place6-3, 6-1
2024-07-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesClare Belott / Margaret Jacobsen vs Kelley Malama / Sarah Sasek6-1, 6-4
2024-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesMargaret Jacobsen / Clare Belott vs Nicola Ash / Julia Henry6-0, 6-2
2024-07-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMonique Gill / Margaret Jacobsen vs Amy Carolan / Jennifer Pultz6-4, 6-1
2024-06-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesMonique Gill / Melissa Dollar vs Elise D Harvey / Elizabeth Arwood6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Clare Belott
50W–20L career
0%41%59%
3.64
3.5
Monique Gill
33W–23L career
not enough data
3
Margaret Jacobsen
70W–50L career
0%99%1%
2.85

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.