Teams

Rovner - Genesis

2022 IA 18 & Over Adult League · 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-21vs Nixon & Rickert - LifetimeWon 10
W#1 SinglesJoy Johnson vs Dina Dulaney5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-14vs Krause & Bruntz - GenesisWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Johnson / Joy Bachmann vs Sarah Corell / Angela Torgerson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWillow Bauer / Amanda Hilton vs Julie Bruntz / Mary Krause2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJune MacKay / Joy Johnson vs Ewa Pratt / Beth Eganhouse6-3, 6-2
2022-05-07vs Smith & Hagan - GenesisWon 32
W#1 DoublesDawn Ver Steeg / Leslie Shipp vs Leanna White / Mary Jo Sherrill6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJoy Johnson vs Jennifer Smith6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLori Marchese / Liz Mallaney vs Aubrey Grant / Janell Kallenbach7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAnne Pham vs Julie Kinsella1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Edwards / Amanda Hilton vs Renea Hagan / Mitzi Hetherton4-6, 3-6
2022-04-23vs IA/Hill-Matthes & Fink/18&Over4.0WLost 14
W#1 DoublesLeslie Shipp / Dawn Ver Steeg vs Jocelyn Fink / Ree Greteman6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJanet Johnson vs Heidi Hill-Matthes0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLori Marchese / Liz Mallaney vs Andi Laine / Siri Long4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesAnne Pham vs Deana Hoganson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWillow Bauer / June MacKay vs Tiffany Lavastida / Holly Shortenhaus6-7, 1-6
W#1 DoublesDawn Ver Steeg / Leslie Shipp vs Tiffany Lavastida / Andi Laine6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKristen Johansen vs Heidi Hill-Matthes0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLori Marchese / Liz Mallaney vs Holly Shortenhaus / Tina Schoenfelder6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAnne Pham vs Deana Hoganson0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesWillow Bauer / June MacKay vs Cara O'Neill / Jennifer Clemen7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-03-05vs Smith & Hagan - GenesisWon 32
L#1 DoublesKristen Johansen / Lori Marchese vs Leanna White / Julie Kinsella1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJoy Johnson vs Sarah Morrow6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDawn Ver Steeg / Jessica Edwards vs Heather Ditsworth / Janell Kallenbach6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAnne Pham vs Jennifer Heil2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Kozlowski / Jenn Willis vs Renea Hagan / Aubrey Grant7-6, 6-3
2022-02-26vs Nixon & Rickert - LifetimeLost 23
W#1 DoublesWillow Bauer / Dawn Ver Steeg vs Dina Dulaney / Tina Duenow6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJoy Johnson vs Lucy White6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmanda Hilton / Jessica Edwards vs Jessica Stewart / Luann Gilman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJanet Johnson vs Allison Anderson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Kozlowski / Jenn Willis vs Jennifer Dovre / Pamela Christoffers2-6, 1-6
2022-02-12vs Krause & Bruntz - GenesisLost 23
L#1 DoublesJanet Johnson / Kristen Johansen vs Kalan Clark / Kathleen Weyers2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJoy Johnson vs Mary Krause6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDawn Ver Steeg / Willow Bauer vs Kim Stewart / Connie VanRoekel6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAnne Pham vs Rachel Morgan0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJoy Bachmann / June MacKay vs Julie Bruntz / Sandy Wegner4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Joy Johnson
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.96
Dawn Ver Steeg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Willow Bauer
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.79
Jenn Willis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Anne Pham
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.76
Amanda Hilton
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Lori Marchese
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.56
Kristen Johansen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.19
Joy Bachmann
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published
Janet Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Jennifer Kozlowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jessica Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
June MacKay
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Leslie Shipp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Liz Mallaney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Ver Steeg + Willow Bauer7061% games+9.1% vs expected
Janet Johnson + Joy Johnson11358% games+7.2% vs expected
Dawn Ver Steeg + Lori Marchese22364% games+6.3% vs expected
Janet Johnson + Joy Bachmann3445% games+2.5% vs expected
Liz Mallaney + Lori Marchese10257% games+0.8% vs expected
Leslie Shipp + Dawn Ver Steeg13559% games+0.7% vs expected
Janet Johnson + Kristen Johansen4256% gamesnot enough data
Janet Johnson + Dawn Ver Steeg0529% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joy Johnson
43W–12L career · 6 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
4.13
4
Dawn Ver Steeg
76W–30L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.96
Willow Bauer
25W–16L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Jenn Willis
37W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Anne Pham
99W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Amanda Hilton
60W–26L career · 9 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Lori Marchese
40W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Kristen Johansen
24W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Joy Bachmann
30W–51L career · 10 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
Janet Johnson
31W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Kozlowski
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jessica Edwards
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
June MacKay
12W–35L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Leslie Shipp
64W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Liz Mallaney
16W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.